Engineered nanoparticles, How brain friendly is this new guest?
Abstract
In the last 30 years, the use of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) has progressively increased in many industrial and medical applications. In therapy, NPs may allow more effective cellular and subcellular targeting of drugs. In diagnostic applications, quantum dots are exploited for their optical characteristics, while superparamagnetic iron oxides NPs are used in magnetic resonance imaging. NPs are used in semiconductors, packaging, textiles, solar cells, batteries and plastic materials. Despite the great progress in nanotechnologies, comparatively little is known to date on the effects that exposure to NPs may have on the human body, in general and specifically on the brain. NPs can enter the human body through skin, digestive tract, airways and blood and they may cross the blood-brain barrier to reach the central nervous system. In addition to the paucity of studies describing NP effects on brain function, some of them also suffer of insufficient NPs characterization, inadequate standardization of conditions and lack of contaminant evaluation, so that results from different studies can hardly be compared. It has been shown in vitro and in vivo in rodents that NPs can impair dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems. Changes of neuronal morphology and neuronal death were reported in mice treated with NPs. NPs can also affect the respiratory chain of mitochondria and Bax protein levels, thereby causing apoptosis. Changes in expression of genes involved in redox pathways in mouse…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since it has been shown that certain customized nanoparticles may damage dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems, a further detailed analysis of the biodistribution and metabolism of nanoparticles will be required.
“Since it has been shown that certain customized nanoparticles may damage dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems, a further detailed analysis of the biodistribution and metabolism of nanoparticles will be required.”
From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Cupaioli et al., 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 208 · Cited by 139
- Authors
- Cupaioli, F. A., Zucca, F. A., Boraschi, D., & Zecca, L.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Biomedical Technologies (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Zecca, Luigi
- Venue
- Progress in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 119-120
- Pages
- 20-38
- ISSN
- 0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974788688
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 208
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Fondazione Cariplo
- Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (01_01297)
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (PB.P05, RBNE08ZZN7)
- Seventh Framework Programme (PITN-GA-2010-264506)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
- Keywords
- engineered nanoparticles, nanoparticle toxicity, brain, blood-brain barrier, dopaminergic system, serotonergic system, neuronal cell death, mitochondrial respiratory chain, apoptosis, Bax, autophagy, lysosomes, neuroinflammation, microglial activation, neurodegeneration, redox pathways, cytoskeleton, vesicle trafficking, nanomaterial safety, quantum dots, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
- MeSH terms
- Air Pollutants, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Humans, Drug Delivery Systems, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review