Cited by 35Circadian rhythm and melatoninOcular and Laser Science ResearchRetinal Development and Disorders

Impact of blue vs red light on retinal response of patients with seasonal affective disorder and healthy controls.

Gagné, Anne-Marie, Lévesque, Frédéric, Gagné, Philippe, Hébert, Marc·2011·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is characterized by a mood lowering in autumn and/or winter followed by spontaneous remission in spring or summer. Bright light (BL) is recognized as the treatment of choice for individuals affected with this disease. It was speculated that BL acts on photosensitive retinal ganglion cells, particularly sensitive to blue light, which led to the emergence of apparatus enriched with blue light. However, blue light is more at risk to cause retinal damage. In addition, we reported using electroretinography (ERG) that a 60 min exposure of BL could reduce rod sensitivity. The goal of the present study was to verify if this decreased in sensitivity could be a consequence of the blue light portion present in the white light therapy lamps. We also wanted to assess the effect of monochromatic blue light vs red light in both healthy controls and patients with SAD. Method 10 healthy subjects and 10 patients with SAD were exposed in a random order for 60 min to two different light colors (red or blue) separated by an interval of at least 1 day. Cone and rod ERG luminance-response function was assessed after light exposure. Results A two-way ANOVA indicates that blue light decreases the maximal ERG response (Vmax) in both groups in photopic (p<0.05) and scotopic conditions (p<0.01). Conclusion The main finding of this experiment is that blue light reduces photoreceptor responses after only a single administration. This brings important concerns with regard to blue-enriched light therapy lamps used to treat SAD symptoms and other disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.11.009

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gagné, A.-M., Lévesque, F., Gagné, P., & Hébert, M.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Corresponding author
Gagné, Anne-Marie
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
227-231
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121998081
Cited by
35
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular and Laser Science Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
seasonal affective disorder, blue light, red light, bright light therapy, electroretinogram, retinal ganglion cells, rod photoreceptors, cone photoreceptors, photoreceptor sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Color, Electroretinography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Light, Male, Photic Stimulation, Retina, Seasonal Affective Disorder, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review