The cultural practices of first-generation college graduates: The role of childhood cultural exposure
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The social and gender gap in cultural participation among adults is at least partly related to differences in engagement in childhood and adolescence.
“The social and gender gap in cultural participation among adults is therefore, at least partly, related to differences in engagement in childhood and adolescence (Christin, 2012;Dumais, 2019).”
From Arts and cultural participation among 17-year-olds (2020) · cites this paper as Dumais, 2019
Cites
Music education promotes lifelong engagement with the arts
Elpus, K. (2018) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735617697508 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arts and cultural participation among 17-year-olds
ESRI, & Smyth, E. (2020) · doi:10.26504/rs103 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dumais, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Lehman College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dumais, Susan A.
- ORCID
- Dumais, Susan A.
- Venue
- Poetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 101378
- ISSN
- 0304-422X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2964620418
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Poetics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Keywords
- first-generation college graduates, cultural participation, cultural capital, intergenerational transmission, arts participation, cultural taste
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review