Cited by 20Geographies of human-animal interactionsSocial Sciences and HumanitiesChina's Ethnic Minorities and Relations

Transnational environmentalism and entanglements of sovereignty: The tiger campaign across the Himalayas

Yeh, Emily T.·2012·Political Geography

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.06.003

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeh, E. T.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Yeh, Emily T.
Venue
Political Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
408-418
ISSN
0962-6298 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072434651
Cited by
20
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
9.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Geography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Keywords
transnational environmentalism, sovereignty, tiger conservation, Dalai Lama, threatened species, Indian sovereignty, assemblage, nature protection, post-sovereignty, Himalaya, environmental activism, conjunctural analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review