Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 66Migration and Exile StudiesPeacebuilding and International SecurityMigration, Racism, and Human Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘Occupied Enclave’: Policing and the underbelly of humanitarian governance in Kakuma refugee camp, Kenya

Brankamp, Hanno·2019·Political Geography
DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.02.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract This article transports discussions on the geographies of occupation to the refugee camp and infers that rethinking militarised policing in camps as a form of occupation brings into sharper relief the everyday violence of humanitarian governance. While most research on the administration of camps has focused on the biopolitical control of humanitarian agencies and NGOs that register, sustain, and manage refugee lives in exile, far less is known about the role of the police and paramilitary. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Kakuma refugee camp in northern Kenya, this article provides an alternative reading of the militarised spatialities of the camp, in which Kenya's (post)colonial disposition for state violence has merged indistinguishably with the contemporary securitisation of refugees, and the humanitarian need for unobstructed management of aid operations. This article proposes that these converging trajectories have transformed the refugee camp into a zone under military-style occupation: an ‘occupied enclave’. In this tightly controlled space, Kenyan police act as enforcers of humanitarian violence that is inflicted on a civilian population of refugees with precarious life chances and limited freedom of movement. This is analysed through four domains of occupation – architecture, bureaucracy, physical force and material extraction – that work in conjunction to produce violent spatial effects of immobility, exclusion, and exception. Revisiting the camp through this lens bridges the gap between the literatures on humanitarian governance and military occupation and reiterates the continuing importance of enclave spaces for governing mobile and unwanted populations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.02.008

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 101 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Slaughter, 2009, New issues in refugee research. A surrogate state? The role of UNHCR in protracted refugee situations, New Issues in Refugee Research, 168, 17

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Brankamp, H.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Brankamp, Hanno
ORCID
Brankamp, Hanno
Venue
Political Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
71
Pages
67-77
ISSN
0962-6298 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.02.008
OpenAlex
W2922298151
Cited by
62
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
13.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Political Geography (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC (ES/J500112/1)
  • German National Academic Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
  • Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
Keywords
refugee camps, humanitarian governance, occupation, Kakuma refugee camp, everyday violence, exclusion, state violence, postcolonial state, bureaucracy, material extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.