Cited by 28Polymer Foaming and CompositesNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesLignin and Wood Chemistry

Surface response and photodegradation performance of bio-based polyurethane-forest derivatives foam composites

de Avila Delucis, Rafael, Fischer Kerche, Eduardo, Gatto, Darci Alberto, Magalhães Esteves, Washington Luiz, Petzhold, Cesar Liberato, Campos Amico, Sandro·2019·Polymer Testing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106102

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Avila Delucis, R., Fischer Kerche, E., Gatto, D. A., Magalhães Esteves, W. L., Petzhold, C. L., & Campos Amico, S.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR)
Venue
Polymer Testing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
80
Pages
106102
ISSN
0142-9418 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972205784
Cited by
28
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Polymer Testing (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Foaming and Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lignin and Wood Chemistry
Keywords
rigid polyurethane foam, wood waste, bark, kraft lignin, paper mill sludge, photodegradation, photoaging, surface color, specular gloss, wettability, biocomposites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review