Cited by 142Fungal Plant Pathogen ControlPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementEssential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity

Control of postharvest fungal rots on citrus fruit and sweet cherries using a pomegranate peel extract

Li Destri Nicosia, Maria G., Pangallo, Sonia, Raphael, Ginat, Romeo, Flora V., Strano, Maria C., Rapisarda, Paolo, Droby, Samir, Schena, Leonardo·2016·Postharvest Biology and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.11.012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Garlic extracts have antifungal activity on apples and bananas; pomegranate extracts on sweet cherries, table grapes, and potato tubers.

    “This is the case of garlic extracts on apples (Daniel et al., 2015) and bananas (Sanwal and Payasi, 2007), or pomegranate extracts on sweet cherries (Li Destri Nicosia et al., 2016), table grapes (Romeo et al., 2015), and potato tubers (Elsherbiny et al., 2016).”
  • Extracts from garlic, pomegranate, Sanguisorba sp., Orobanche sp., Huamuchil, Accacia sp., Whitania sp., and Parastrephia sp. showed significant activity against major citrus postharvest pathogens P. digitatum, P. italicum, or G. citri-aurantii.

    “Extracts from plants that presented a significant activity against the most important citrus postharvest pathogens P. digitatum , P. italicum, or G. citri-aurantii include garlic (Obagwu and Korsten, 2003), pomegranate (Li Destri Nicosia et al., 2016), Sanguisorba sp., Orobanche sp. (Gatto et al., 2011), Huamuchil (BarreraNecha et al., 2003), Accacia sp., Whitania sp. (Mekbib et al., 2009”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li Destri Nicosia, M. G., Pangallo, S., Raphael, G., Romeo, F. V., Strano, M. C., Rapisarda, P., Droby, S., & Schena, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Reggio Calabria (IT)
  • Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
  • Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria (IT)
Corresponding author
Schena, Leonardo
Venue
Postharvest Biology and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
114
Pages
54-61
ISSN
0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2196292976
Cited by
142
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Postharvest Biology and Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (PON03PE_00090_03)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Keywords
pomegranate peel extract, citrus fruit, sweet cherry, antifungal natural products, Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium digitatum, Penicillium expansum, Penicillium italicum, Monilinia laxa, conidial germination inhibition, residual activity, curative activity, fruit decay control, lemon, apple

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review