CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40Plant Surface Properties and TreatmentsPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Filling gaps in our knowledge on the cuticle of mangoes (Mangifera indica) by analyzing six fruit cultivars: Architecture/structure, postharvest physiology and possible resistance to fruit fly (Tephritidae) attack

Camacho-Vázquez, Carolina, Ruiz-May, Eliel, Guerrero-Analco, José A., Elizalde-Contreras, José M., Enciso-Ortiz, Erick J., Rosas-Saito, Greta, López-Sánchez, Lorena, Kiel-Martínez, Ana L., Bonilla-Landa, Israel, Monribot-Villanueva, Juan L., Olivares-Romero, José L., Gutiérrez-Martínez, Porfirio, Tafolla-Arellano, Julio C., Tiznado-Hernandez, Martín E., Quiroz-Figueroa, Francisco R., Birke, Andrea, Aluja, Martín·2019·Postharvest Biology and Technology
DOI 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.10.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.10.006

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Petit-Jiménez, 2007, Cuticular changes during the ontogeny of Mangifera indica L. fruits, Rev. Fitotec. Mex., 30, 51
  2. Sekhar, 2013, Production and export of mango in Inida-a paradigm to the developing nations, AIJRHASS, 78
  3. Tamjinda, 1992, Anatomy of lenticels and the occurrence of their discolouration in mangoes (Mangifera indica cv ‘Namdokmai’), Kasetsart J., 26, 57
  4. Vijay, 2007, Intervarietal differences in the surface morphology and anatomy of mango (Mangnifera indica L.) fruit, Phytomorphology, 57, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Camacho-Vázquez, C., Ruiz-May, E., Guerrero-Analco, J. A., Elizalde-Contreras, J. M., Enciso-Ortiz, E. J., Rosas-Saito, G., López-Sánchez, L., Kiel-Martínez, A. L., Bonilla-Landa, I., Monribot-Villanueva, J. L., Olivares-Romero, J. L., Gutiérrez-Martínez, P., Tafolla-Arellano, J. C., Tiznado-Hernandez, M. E., Quiroz-Figueroa, F. R., Birke, A., & Aluja, M.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Tecnológico de Tepic (MX)
  • Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (MX)
ORCID
Venue
Postharvest Biology and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
148
Pages
83-96
ISSN
0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.10.006
OpenAlex
W2900145988
Cited by
40
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Postharvest Biology and Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
CONACYT
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Keywords
mango, fruit cuticle, epicuticular wax, cutin monomers, cuticle thickening, lenticels, postharvest shelf life, Tephritidae, abscisic acid, fruit firmness, mango cultivars, Tommy Atkins, criollos

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review