Comparing cardiac output measurements using electrical cardiometry versus phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In patients without intracardiac shunting, CMRI can internally validate cardiac output measurements by comparing volumetric or flow-based data from both ventricles.
“In patients without intracardiac shunting, CMRI can internally validate cardiac output measurements by comparing volumetric or flow-based data from both ventricles [60].”
From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [60]
Cardiac output estimated via electrical cardiometry has good correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients with congenital heart defects, although electrical cardiometry tends to slightly overestimate cardiac output.
“Cardiac output estimated via EC has also shown good correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) in pediatric patients with congenital heart defects, although EC tends to slightly overestimate CO [60].”
From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- Sumbel, L., Nagaraju, L., Ogbeifun, H., Agarwal, A., & Bhalala, U.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of San Antonio (US)
- UC Davis Children's Hospital (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Driscoll Children's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bhalala, Utpal
- Venue
- Progress in Pediatric Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 66
- Pages
- 101551
- ISSN
- 1058-9813 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4283766857
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Progress in Pediatric Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- cardiac output, electrical cardiometry, non-invasive cardiac output measurement, measurement agreement, pediatric cardiac patients, congenital heart disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
