The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/boj.12385 · Cited by 9,555
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754 · cited 2×
“It is unclear whether the same results would be obtained under lower nutrient conditions where root competition would likely be much more intense (Grime, 1977; Casper and Jackson, 1997; Keddy, 2001), or where they may have been nonadditive interactions between above- and belowground competition (Cahill, 1999).”
BackgroundTESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x · Cited by 4,678
Phylogenies and Community Ecology
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A., & Donoghue, M. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448 · Cited by 4,609
Iii, A. (2009) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · Cited by 3,983
Hardin, G. (1960) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.131.3409.1292 · Cited by 3,426
THE ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP* (2003) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x · Cited by 2,991
Niche Conservatism: Integrating Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation Biology
Wiens, J. J., & Graham, C. H. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431 · Cited by 2,615
Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-0924 · Cited by 2,299
Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties
Grime, J. P. (2001) · Cited by 2,087
Cited by
The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology
Cavender‐Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A., & Kembel, S. W. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x · Cited by 2,321
Self-citationFunctional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity–ecosystem-function relationships
Flynn, D. F. B., Mirotchnick, N., Jain, M., Palmer, M. I., & Naeem, S. (2011) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/10-1245.1 · Cited by 890
Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity
Cadotte, M. W., Cardinale, B. J., & Oakley, T. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805962105 · Cited by 653
Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems
Srivastava, D. S., Cadotte, M. W., MacDonald, A. A. M., Marushia, R. G., & Mirotchnick, N. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01795.x · Cited by 648
Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure
VAMOSI, S. M., HEARD, S. B., VAMOSI, J. C., & WEBB, C. O. (2009) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.04001.x · Cited by 648
Metadata
- Authors
- Cahill, J. F., Kembel, S. W., Lamb, E. G., & Keddy, P. A.
- Venue
- Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-50
- ISSN
- 1433-8319 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064235157
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ppees.2007.10.001
- The paper
- Cahill, J. F., Kembel, S. W., Lamb, E. G., & Keddy, P. A. (2008). Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2007.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
