Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 473

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why does the quark–gluon plasma at RHIC behave as a nearly ideal fluid?

Open access
Shuryak, Edward·2004·Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics

Abstract

Abstract This article gives a brief review in the following areas. (i) Collective flow phenomena in heavy ion collisions. The data from RHIC indicate robust collective flows, well described by hydrodynamics with the expected equation of state. The transport properties turned out to be unexpected, with very small viscosity. (ii) The physics of highly excited matter produced in heavy ion collisions at T c T T c , different from that of weakly coupled quark–gluon plasma because of the relatively strong coupling generating bound states of quasiparticles. (iii) Wider discussion of other “strongly coupled systems”, including strongly coupled supersymmetric theories studied via Maldacena duality, as well as recent progress as regards trapped atoms with very large scattering lengths.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.02.025

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 473

Metadata

Authors
Shuryak, E.
Venue
Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-07
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
273-303
ISSN
0146-6410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023430982
Cited by
473
References
28
FWCI
20.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why does the quark–gluon plasma at RHIC behave as a nearly ideal fluid? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.02.025
The paper
Shuryak, E. (2004). Why does the quark–gluon plasma at RHIC behave as a nearly ideal fluid? Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.02.025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.