The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relevance and prosody
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An argument for basic emotions
Ekman, P. (1992) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 · Cited by 9,646
Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism
Millikan, R. G. (1984) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4124.001.0001 · Cited by 4,758
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2412 · Cited by 3,670
Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind."
Leslie, A. M. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.4.412 · Cited by 3,379
How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226218526.001.0001 · Cited by 2,268
The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective
König, E. (1991) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5854913 · Cited by 242
Cited by
More than words (and faces): evidence for a Stroop effect of prosody in emotion word processing
Filippi, P., Ocklenburg, S., Bowling, D. L., Heege, L., Güntürkün, O., Newen, A., & de Boer, B. (2017) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1177489 · Cited by 52
Lau, J. C. Y., Guilfoyle, J., Crawford, S., Johnson, G., Landau, E., Xing, J., Kumareswaran, M., Ethridge, S., Butler, M., Goldman, L., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26062481 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, D., & Wharton, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Pragmatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1559-1579
- ISSN
- 0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011976355
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 87.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relevance and prosody. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.012
- The paper
- Wilson, D., & Wharton, T. (2006). Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
