Cited by 3,670Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAction Observation and Synchronization

Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind

·1995·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Mindblindness and mindreading evolutionary psychology and social chess mindreading - nature's choice developing mindreading - the four steps autism and mindblindness how brains read minds the language of the eyes mindreading - back to the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.33-2412

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1995-12-01
Volume
33
Issue
04
Pages
33-2412-33-2412
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2045001730
Cited by
3,670
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 152 · 2016: 159 · 2015: 207 · 2014: 229 · 2013: 220 · 2012: 227
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
mindblindness, autism spectrum disorder, theory of mind, evolutionary psychology, social cognition, social cognition development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review