Cited by 536Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesLinguistics and Language Analysis

The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction

Mondada, Lorenza·2014·Journal of Pragmatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mondada, L.
Affiliations
University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Mondada, Lorenza
Venue
Journal of Pragmatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
65
Pages
137-156
ISSN
0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140349367
Cited by
536
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
108.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Pragmatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
multimodal resources, action formation, embodiment, pedagogical interaction, adult immigrants, culinary education, gardening instruction, Finnish language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review