Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 490

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction

Mondada, Lorenza·2019·Journal of Pragmatics
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract This paper reviews some current trends characterizing the specific perspective of ethnomethodologically inspired conversation analysis on the situated organization of action. It also discusses contemporary challenges represented within this paradigm by the study of materiality and embodiment in social interaction. In order to further elaborate on the nexus between action, bodies, and materiality, I show on the basis of an empirical exemplary situation, how research on multimodality – that is, on the diversity of resources that participants mobilize to produce and understand social interaction as publicly intelligible action, including language, gesture, gaze, body postures, movements, and embodied manipulations of objects – can be further expanded by considering not only embodied resources for interacting but also embodied practices for sensing the world in an intersubjective way.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Couper-Kuhlen, 2001, Argumente für die Entwicklung einer interaktionalen Linguistik, Gesprächsforschung, 1, 76
  2. Fele, 2016, Il paradosso del gusto, SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 7, 151
  3. Foucault, 1979, vol. 1
  4. Kendon, 1970, Movement coordination in social interaction, Acta Psychol., 29, 100
  5. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 2006, Politeness in small shops in France, J. Politeness Res. Lang. Behav. Cult., 2, 79
  6. Sacks, 1992, vol. 2
  7. Schegloff, 2007, vol. 1

Cited by

See all 490

Metadata

Authors
Mondada, L.
Venue
Journal of Pragmatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
145
Pages
47-62
ISSN
0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
OpenAlex
W2912444173
Cited by
490
References
83
FWCI
224.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Funders
  • Academy of Finland
  • University of Helsinki (Finland)
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (Switzerland)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
The paper
Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.