Cited by 38Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisLinguistic Studies and Language Acquisition

Combinations of discourse markers with repairs and repetitions in English, French and Spanish

Open access
Crible, Ludivine, Pascual, Elena·2020·Journal of Pragmatics

Abstract

Abstract Discourse markers have a central role in planning and repairing processes of speech production. They relate with fluency and disfluency phenomena such as pauses, repetitions and reformulations. Their polyfunctionality is challenging and few form-function mappings are stable cross-linguistically. This study combines a functional and a structural approach to discourse markers and their combination with and within repetitions and self-repairs in native English, French and Spanish, in order to establish the inter-relation between these three fluency-related devices and to find potentially universal patterns of use. Qualitative coding and quantitative analyses of categories of markers and repairs allowed us to identify discourse markers which are specific to repair sequences and others which are much more pervasive. Combinations with repetitions vary across languages and repair types. Our findings fill a gap in cross-linguistic fluency research, disentangle the overlap between discourse markers, repairs and repetitions, and can be integrated into pedagogical materials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.002

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Crible, 2019, Discourse and pragmatic markers in speech and sign: introduction, J. Pragmat.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crible, L., & Pascual, E.
Affiliations
Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
Crible, Ludivine
Venue
Journal of Pragmatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
156
Pages
54-67
ISSN
0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946185075
Cited by
38
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
21.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pragmatics (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (FFI2016-75249-P, FPU14/06378)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology (IS1312)
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
Keywords
discourse markers, self-healing, repetition, reformulation, speech production, fluency, disfluency, cross-linguistic comparison, English language, French language, Spanish language, Romance languages, form-function mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review