CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A study on the functional uses of textual pragmatic markers by native speakers and English-medium instruction learners

Ament, Jennifer, Páres, Júlia Barón, Pérez-Vidal, Carmen·2020·Journal of Pragmatics
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Airey, 2012, “I don't teach English”: the linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden, AILA Rev., 1, 64, 10.1075/aila.25.05air · DOI
  2. Ament, 2015, Linguistic outcomes of English medium instruction programmes in higher education: A study on economics undergraduates at a Catalan University, Higher Learning Research Communications, 5, 47, 10.18870/hlrc.v5i1.239 · DOI
  3. Ament, 2018, The effects of English-medium instruction on the use of textual and interpersonal pragmatic markers, Pragmatics, 28, 517
  4. Babanglu, 2014, A corpus-based study on the use of pragmtic markers as speech like features in Turkish EFL learners' argumentative essays, Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 136, 186, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.312 · DOI
  5. Bu, 2013, A study of the acquisition of discourse markers by Chinese learners of English, Int. J. Engl. Stud., 13, 29, 10.6018/ijes/2013/1/152681 · DOI
  6. Buysse, 2012, So as a multifunctional discourse marker in native and learner speech, J. Pragmat., 44, 1764, 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.012 · DOI
  7. Buysse, 2015, “Well it's not very ideal ...” the pragmatic marker well in learner English, Intercult. Pragmat., 12, 59, 10.1515/ip-2015-0003 · DOI
  8. Cheng, 1996, Metadiscourse: a technique for improving student writing, Res. Teach. Engl., 149, 10.58680/rte199615322 · DOI
  9. Crible, 2017, Discourse markers in Speech : characteristics and challenges for corpus annotation, Dialog. Discourse, 8, 149, 10.5087/dad.2017.207 · DOI
  10. Crible, 2017, The clustering of discourse markers and filled pauses. A corpus-based French-English study of (dis)fluency, Lang. Contrast, 17, 69, 10.1075/lic.17.1.04cri · DOI
  11. Cuenca, 2008, Pragmatic markers in contrast: the case of well, J. Pragmat., 40, 1373, 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.013 · DOI
  12. Dafouz, 2014, “Surely they can't do as well”: a comparison of business students' academic performance in English-medium and Spanish-as-first-language-medium programmes, Lang. Educ., 28, 223, 10.1080/09500782.2013.808661 · DOI
  13. Fernández, 2014, Oral proficiency and pragmatic marker use in L2 spoken Spanish: the case of pues and bueno, J. Pragmat., 74, 150, 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.005 · DOI
  14. Fischer, 2014, Discourse markers, vol. 3, 271
  15. Flowerdew, 1995, The effect of discourse markers on second language comprehension, Stud. Second Lang. Acquis., 17, 435, 10.1017/S0272263100014406 · DOI
  16. Fox Tree, 1999, Discourse markers in spontaneous speech: oh what a difference an oh makes, J. Mem. Lang., 40, 280, 10.1006/jmla.1998.2613 · DOI
  17. Fraser, 1996, Pragmatic markers, Pragmatics, 6, 167
  18. Fraser, 1999, What are discourse markers?, J. Pragmat., 31, 931, 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5 · DOI
  19. Fung, 2007, Discourse markers and spoken English: native and learner use in pedagogic settings, Appl. Linguist., 28, 410, 10.1093/applin/amm030 · DOI
  20. González, 2005, Pragmatic markers and discourse coherence relations in English and Catalan oral narrative, Discourse Stud., 7, 53, 10.1177/1461445605048767 · DOI
  21. Hellekjær, 2015, Is Anglophone complacency a virtue of necessity?: the gap between the need for and supply of occupational second foreign language skills in Norwegian business and government, Scand. J. Educ. Res., 59, 143, 10.1080/00313831.2014.904412 · DOI
  22. Hellermann, 2007, Language which is not taught: the discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English, J. Pragmat., 39, 157, 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.008 · DOI
  23. House, 1996, Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: routines and metapragmatic awareness, Stud. Second Lang. Acquis., 18, 225, 10.1017/S0272263100014893 · DOI
  24. House, 2013, Developing pragmatic competence in English as a lingua franca: using discourse markers to express (inter)subjectivity and connectivity, J. Pragmat., 59, 57, 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.001 · DOI
  25. Hyland, 2017, Metadiscourse: what is it and where is it going?, J. Pragmat., 113, 16, 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007 · DOI
  26. Jucker, 1998, Discourse markers: introduction, 1, 10.1075/pbns.57.03juc · DOI
  27. Jung, 2003, The role of discourse signalling cues in second language listening comprehension, Mod. Lang. J., 87, 562, 10.1111/1540-4781.00208 · DOI
  28. Jung, 2003, The role of discourse signaling cues in second language listening comprehension, Mod. Lang. J., 87, 562, 10.1111/1540-4781.00208 · DOI
  29. Kuteeva, 2014, Disciplinary differences in the use of English in higher education: reflections on recent language policy developments, High. Educ., 67, 533, 10.1007/s10734-013-9660-6 · DOI
  30. Lei, 2014, Is English-medium instruction effective in improving Chinese undergraduate students' English competence?, IRAL Int. Rev. Appl. Linguist. Lang. Teach., 52, 99
  31. Li, 2015, Effective teaching in the use of pragmatic markers for Chinese EFL learners, Univers. J. Educ. Res., 3, 822, 10.13189/ujer.2015.031107 · DOI
  32. Liu, 2013, Effect of first language on the use of English discourse markers by L1 Chinese speakers of English, J. Pragmat., 45, 149, 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.002 · DOI
  33. Liu, 2016, Effect of L2 exposure: from a perspective of discourse markers, Appl. Ling. Rev., 7, 73
  34. LoCastro, 2001, Individual differences in second language acquisition: attitudes, learner subjectivity, and L2 pragmatic norms, System, 29, 69, 10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00046-4 · DOI
  35. Lörscher, 1986, Conversational structures in the foreign language classroom, Learn. Teach. Commun. Foreign Lang. Classr., 11–22
  36. Maschler, 1994, Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation, Lang. Soc., 23, 325, 10.1017/S0047404500018017 · DOI
  37. Neary-Sundquist, 2013, Task type effects on pragmatic marker use by learners at varying proficiency levels, L2 Journal, 5, 1, 10.5070/L25212104 · DOI
  38. Neary-Sundquist, 2014, The use of pragmatic markers across proficiency levels in second language speech, Stud. Second Lang. Learn. Teach., 4, 637, 10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.4.4 · DOI
  39. Polat, 2011, Investigating acquisition of discourse markers through a developmental learner corpus, J. Pragmat., 43, 3745, 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.09.009 · DOI
  40. Pons Bordería, 2009, Expressing digression linguistically: do digressive markers exist?, J. Pragmat., 41, 921, 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.011 · DOI
  41. Redeker, 1990, Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure, J. Pragmat., 14, 367, 10.1016/0378-2166(90)90095-U · DOI
  42. Reza, 2010, The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: a framework for the use of metadiscourse, J. Pragmat., 42, 1669, 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.001 · DOI
  43. Romero-Trillo, 2002, The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English, J. Pragmat., 34, 769, 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00022-X · DOI
  44. Rouchota, 1996, Discourse conectives: what do they link?, UCL Work. Pap. Linguist., 8, 199
  45. Schourup, 1999, Tutorial overview: discourse markers, Lingua, 107, 227, 10.1016/S0024-3841(96)90026-1 · DOI
  46. Schourup, 2011, The discourse marker now: a relevance-theoretic approach, J. Pragmat., 43, 2110, 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.005 · DOI
  47. Shively, 2015, Developing interactional competence during study abroad: listener responses in L2 Spanish, System, 48, 86, 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.007 · DOI
  48. Smit, 2012, Integrating content and language in higher education: an introduction to English-medium policies, conceptual issues and research practices across Europe, AILA Rev., 25, 1, 10.1075/aila.25.01smi · DOI
  49. Trenchs-Parera, 2009, Effects of formal instruction and a stay abroad on the acquisition of native-Like oral fluency, Can. Mod. Lang. Rev., 65, 365, 10.3138/cmlr.65.3.365 · DOI
  50. Unterberger, 2012, English-medium programmes at Austrian business faculties. A status quo survey on national trends and a case study on programme design and delivery, AILA Rev., 1, 80, 10.1075/aila.25.06unt · DOI
  51. Vellenga, 2004, Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: how likely?, Tesl-Ej, 9, 1
  52. Verschueren, 2000, Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use, Pragmatics, 10, 439
  53. Waltereit, 2006, The rise of discourse markers in Italian: a specific type of language change, Approaches to discourse particles, 1, 61, 10.1163/9780080461588_005 · DOI
  54. Wei, 2011, Investigating the oral proficiency of English learners in China: a comparative study of the use of pragmatic markers, J. Pragmat., 43, 3455, 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.014 · DOI
  55. Wilson, 1993, Linguistic form and relevance, Lingua, 90, 1, 10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 · DOI
  56. Zare, 2017, The languages of English academic lectures: the case of field of study in highlighting importance, Lingua, 193, 36, 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.04.005 · DOI
  57. Zufferey, 2017, Processing connectives with a complex form-function mapping in L2: the case of French “En Effet”, Front. Psychol., 8, 1, 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01198 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Ament, J., Páres, J. B., & Pérez-Vidal, C.
Venue
Journal of Pragmatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
156
Pages
41-53
ISSN
0378-2166
DOI
10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.009
Cited by
20
References
1
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (FFI2013-48640-C2-1-P)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A study on the functional uses of textual pragmatic markers by native speakers and English-medium instruction learners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.009
The paper
Ament, J., Páres, J. B., & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2020). A study on the functional uses of textual pragmatic markers by native speakers and English-medium instruction learners. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.009