Cited by 10Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Multimodal fusion model for classifying placenta ultrasound imaging in pregnancies with hypertension disorders

Sun, Hongshuang, Jiao, Jing, Ren, Yunyun, Guo, Yi, Wang, Yuanyuan·2023·Pregnancy Hypertension

Abstract

Background A multimodal fusion model was proposed to assist the traditional visual diagnosis in evaluating the placental features of hypertension disorders of pregnancy (HDP).Objective The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the placental features between normal and HDP pregnancies and propose a multimodal fusion deep learning model for differentiating and characterizing the placental features from HDP to normal pregnancy.Methods This observational prospective study included 654 pregnant women, including 75 with HDPs. Grayscale ultrasound images (GSIs) and Microflow images (MFIs) of the placentas were collected from all patients during routine obstetric examinations. On the basis of intelligent extraction and features fusion, after quantities of training and optimization, the classification model named GMNet (the intelligent network based on GSIs and MFIs) was introduced for differentiating the placental features of normal and HDP pregnancies. The distributions of placental features extracted by the deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) were visualized by Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction (UMAP). Metrics including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to score the model. Finally, placental tissue samples were randomly selected for microscopic analyses to prove the interpretability and effectiveness of the GMNet model.Results Compared with the Normal group in ultrasonic images, the light spots were rougher and the parts with focal cystic or hypoechogenic lesions were increased in the HDP groups. The overall diagnostic performance of the GMNet model depending on the region of interest (ROI) was excellent (AUC: 97%), with a sensitivity of 90.0%, a specificity of 93.5%, and an accuracy of 93.1%. The fusion features of GSIs and MFIs in the placenta showed a higher discriminative power than single-mode features (fusion features vs GSI features vs MFI features, 97.0% vs 91.2% vs 94.8%). Furthermore, according to the microscopic analysis, unevenly distributed villi, increased syncyte nodules and aggregated intervillous cellulose deposition were particularly frequent in the HDP cases.Conclusions The GMNet model could sensitively identify abnormal changes in the placental microstructure in pregnancies with HDP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.preghy.2022.12.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 10

Authors
Sun, H., Jiao, J., Ren, Y., Guo, Y., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ren, Yunyun
  • Guo, Yi
  • Wang, Yuanyuan
Venue
Pregnancy Hypertension
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
31
Pages
46-53
ISSN
2210-7789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312054797
Cited by
10
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pregnancy Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (202240083)
  • Fudan University (20019)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
placental ultrasound, multimodal fusion, B-mode ultrasound, placental villi, deep convolutional neural networks
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Placenta, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review