The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glaucomatous damage of the macula
Open accessAbstract
There is a growing body of evidence that early glaucomatous damage involves the macula. The anatomical basis of this damage can be studied using frequency domain optical coherence tomography (fdOCT), by which the local thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and local retinal ganglion cell plus inner plexiform (RGC+) layer can be measured. Based upon averaged fdOCT results from healthy controls and patients, we show that: 1. For healthy controls, the average RGC+ layer thickness closely matches human histological data; 2. For glaucoma patients and suspects, the average RGC+ layer shows greater glaucomatous thinning in the inferior retina (superior visual field (VF)); and 3. The central test points of the 6° VF grid (24-2 test pattern) miss the region of greatest RGC+ thinning. Based upon fdOCT results from individual patients, we have learned that: 1. Local RGC+ loss is associated with local VF sensitivity loss as long as the displacement of RGCs from the foveal center is taken into consideration; and 2. Macular damage is typically arcuate in nature and often associated with local RNFL thinning in a narrow region of the disc, which we call the macular vulnerability zone (MVZ). According to our schematic model of macular damage, most of the inferior region of the macula projects to the MVZ, which is located largely in the inferior quadrant of the disc, a region that is particularly susceptible to glaucomatous damage. A small (cecocentral) region of the inferior macula, and all of the superior macula (inferior VF), project to the temporal quadrant, a region that is less susceptible to damage. The overall message is clear; clinicians need to be aware that glaucomatous damage to the macula is common, can occur early in the disease, and can be missed and/or underestimated with standard VF tests that use a 6° grid, such as the 24-2 VF test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Topography of ganglion cells in human retina
Curcio, C. A., & Allen, K. A. (1990) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903000103 · Cited by 1,844
Garway-Heath, D. F., Poinoosawmy, D., Fitzke, F. W., & Hitchings, R. A. (2000) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00284-0 · Cited by 737
A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage
Hood, D. C., & Kardon, R. H. (2007) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.08.001 · Cited by 703
Self-citationDeterminants of Normal Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Stratus OCT
Budenz, D. L., Anderson, D. R., Varma, R., Schuman, J., Cantor, L., Savell, J., Greenfield, D. S., Patella, V. M., Quigley, H. A., & Tielsch, J. (2007) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.046 · Cited by 684
Quigley, H. A., & Addicks, E. M. (1981) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010139020 · Cited by 676
Reproducibility of Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Schuman, J. S., Pedut-Kloizman, T., Hertzmark, E., Hee, M. R., Wilkins, J. R., Coker, J. G., Puliafito, C. A., Fujimoto, J. G., & Swanson, E. A. (1996) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30410-7 · Cited by 665
Detection of Macular Ganglion Cell Loss in Glaucoma by Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Tan, O., Chopra, V., Lu, A. T.-H., Schuman, J. S., Ishikawa, H., Wollstein, G., Varma, R., & Huang, D. (2009) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.05.025 · Cited by 665
Normal Age-Related Decay of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness
Parikh, R. S., Parikh, S. R., Sekhar, G. C., Prabakaran, S., Babu, J. G., & Thomas, R. (2007) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.023 · Cited by 319
Automated layer segmentation of macular OCT images using dual-scale gradient information
Yang, Q., Reisman, C. A., Wang, Z., Fukuma, Y., Hangai, M., Yoshimura, N., Tomidokoro, A., Araie, M., Raza, A. S., Hood, D. C., et al. (2010) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.18.021293 · Cited by 284
Self-citationDrasdo, N., Millican, C. L., Katholi, C. R., & Curcio, C. A. (2007) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.007 · Cited by 284
Cited by
Li, Z., He, Y., Keel, S., Meng, W., Chang, R. T., & He, M. (2018) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.023 · Cited by 830
At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer’s disease.
Albers, M. W., Gilmore, G. C., Kaye, J., Murphy, C., Wingfield, A., Bennett, D. A., Boxer, A. L., Buchman, A. S., Cruickshanks, K. J., Devanand, D. P., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.514 · Cited by 589
Liu, H., Li, L., Wormstone, I. M., Qiao, C., Zhang, C., Liu, P., Li, S., Wang, H., Mou, D., Pang, R., et al. (2019) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3501 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Hood, D. C., Raza, A. S., de Moraes, C. G. V., Liebmann, J. M., & Ritch, R.
- Venue
- Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 1350-9462 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032872662
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 30.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glaucomatous damage of the macula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.08.003
- The paper
- Hood, D. C., Raza, A. S., de Moraes, C. G. V., Liebmann, J. M., & Ritch, R. (2013). Glaucomatous damage of the macula. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.08.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.