Cited by 779Retinal Imaging and AnalysisRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Artificial intelligence in retina

Open access
Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula, Sadeghipour, Amir, Gerendas, Bianca S., Waldstein, Sebastian M., Bogunović, Hrvoje·2018·Progress in Retinal and Eye Research

Abstract

Major advances in diagnostic technologies are offering unprecedented insight into the condition of the retina and beyond ocular disease. Digital images providing millions of morphological datasets can fast and non-invasively be analyzed in a comprehensive manner using artificial intelligence (AI). Methods based on machine learning (ML) and particularly deep learning (DL) are able to identify, localize and quantify pathological features in almost every macular and retinal disease. Convolutional neural networks thereby mimic the path of the human brain for object recognition through learning of pathological features from training sets, supervised ML, or even extrapolation from patterns recognized independently, unsupervised ML. The methods of AI-based retinal analyses are diverse and differ widely in their applicability, interpretability and reliability in different datasets and diseases. Fully automated AI-based systems have recently been approved for screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR). The overall potential of ML/DL includes screening, diagnostic grading as well as guidance of therapy with automated detection of disease activity, recurrences, quantification of therapeutic effects and identification of relevant targets for novel therapeutic approaches. Prediction and prognostic conclusions further expand the potential benefit of AI in retina which will enable personalized health care as well as large scale management and will empower the ophthalmologist to provide high qua…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.07.004

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt-Erfurth, U., Sadeghipour, A., Gerendas, B. S., Waldstein, S. M., & Bogunović, H.
Affiliations
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula
Venue
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
67
Pages
1-29
ISSN
1350-9462 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886801379
Cited by
779
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 2
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Retinal and Eye Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis (OPTIMA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, retinal imaging, deep learning, convolutional neural networks, diabetic retinopathy screening, maculopathy, retinal disease diagnosis, automated disease detection, prognosis
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological, Humans, Nerve Net, Retinal Diseases, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review