Cited by 51RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryRetinal Development and DisordersCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

RNA-targeting strategies as a platform for ocular gene therapy

Open access
Kumar, Satheesh, Fry, Lewis E., Wang, Jiang-Hui, Martin, Keith R., Hewitt, Alex W., Chen, Fred K., Liu, Guei-Sheung·2023·Progress in Retinal and Eye Research

Abstract

Genetic medicine is offering hope as new therapies are emerging for many previously untreatable diseases. The eye is at the forefront of these advances, as exemplified by the approval of Luxturna® by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) in 2017 for the treatment of one form of Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA), an inherited blindness. Luxturna® was also the first in vivo human gene therapy to gain US FDA approval. Numerous gene therapy clinical trials are ongoing for other eye diseases, and novel delivery systems, discovery of new drug targets and emerging technologies are currently driving the field forward. Targeting RNA, in particular, is an attractive therapeutic strategy for genetic disease that may have safety advantages over alternative approaches by avoiding permanent changes in the genome. In this regard, antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) and RNA interference (RNAi) are the currently popular strategies for developing RNA-targeted therapeutics. Enthusiasm has been further fuelled by the emergence of clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR associated (Cas) systems that allow targeted manipulation of nucleic acids. RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems now provide a novel way to develop RNA-targeted therapeutics and may provide superior efficiency and specificity to existing technologies. In addition, RNA base editing technologies using CRISPR-Cas and other modalities also enable precise alteration of single nucleotides. In…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101110

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, S., Fry, L. E., Wang, J.-H., Martin, K. R., Hewitt, A. W., Chen, F. K., & Liu, G.-S.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Lions Eye Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Liu, Guei-Sheung
Venue
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
92
Pages
101110
ISSN
1350-9462 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285098544
Cited by
51
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Retinal and Eye Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • State Government of Victoria
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1185600)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
ocular gene therapy, RNA-targeting therapeutics, antisense oligonucleotides, RNA interference, CRISPR-Cas, RNA base editing, Leber congenital amaurosis, Luxturna, eye diseases
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Eye Diseases, Humans, RNA, Genetic Therapy, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review