Cited by 21CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Methods for in vitro CRISPR/CasRx-Mediated RNA Editing

Open access
Chuang, Yu-Fan, Wang, Peng-Yuan, Kumar, Satheesh, Lama, Suraj, Lin, Fan-Li, Liu, Guei-Sheung·2021·Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Abstract

Specific changes in the genome have been accomplished by the revolutionary gene-editing tool known as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) system. The advent of programmable RNA editing CRISPR/Cas nucleases has made this gene-editing tool safer and more precise. Specifically, CasRx, a family member of the Cas13d family, has shown great therapeutic potential. Here, we describe the in vitro methods of utilizing this powerful RNA editing platform and determine the RNA editing efficiencies for CasRx with different forms of guide RNAs (also known as gRNA or sgRNA).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fcell.2021.667879

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A previously described CasRx RNA editing system for ocular neovascularization was validated in vitro in HEK293FT and MIO-M1 cells, demonstrating more than 90% and 50% VEGFA mRNA knockdown, respectively.

    “This approach was validated in vitro in HEK293FT and MIO-M1 cells, demonstrating more than 90% and 50% VEGFA mRNA knockdown, respectively (19).”

    From Characterization of RNA editing and gene therapy with a compact CRISPR-Cas13 in the retina (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results section (Figure 3; page unavailable) confirms in vitro VEGFA mRNA testing in HEK293FT and MIO-M1 cells. It reports 47 ± 4% and 68 ± 3% knockdown for the all-in-one constructs in HEK293FT cells, not more than 90%; it describes suppression in MIO-M1 cells without giving the claimed 50% figure. A separate HEK293FT experiment reports 90 ± 2% with a single pre-sgRNA, but that does not establish the stated pair of percentages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chuang, Y.-F., Wang, P.-Y., Kumar, S., Lama, S., Lin, F.-L., & Liu, G.-S.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Peng-Yuan
  • Liu, Guei-Sheung
Venue
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Published
2021-06-11
Volume
9
Pages
667879-667879
ISSN
2296-634X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3170941595
Cited by
21
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1185600)
  • Shenzhen Key Laboratory Fund (ZDSYS20190902093409851)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
RNA editing, Cas13d, guide RNA, single guide RNA, genome editing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review