Bayesian Estimation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Systematic Thoracic Ultrasound Exam for Diagnosis of Bovine Respiratory Disease in Pre-Weaned Calves
Abstract
Among the different clinical presentations of bovine respiratory disease, active pneumonia, defined as an infection of the lower airway with signs of inflammation, is the most important to diagnose correctly so appropriate treatment can be initiated. Diagnostic tests that accurately identify cases of active pneumonia are lacking; however, thoracic ultrasonography (TUS) seems promising. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the accuracy of TUS compared to reference tests for the diagnosis of active pneumonia in pre-weaned calves, using a latent-class model method (LCM). The tests used for comparison were the Wisconsin Clinical Respiratory Scoring Chart (CRSC, positive if ≥5) and serum haptoglobin concentration (Hap, positive if ≥15 mg/dL). Secondary objectives were to assess the incremental value on TUS accuracy of combining TUS of the right cranial part and caudal parts, and to determine the accuracy of various thresholds for depth of consolidation (≥0 cm, ≥1 cm, or ≥3 cm) for diagnosis of active pneumonia. One population of veal calves (n = 209) and one of dairy calves (n = 301) were enrolled. TUS, CRSC and Hap were all performed on each calf on the same day. TUS was performed by screening the mid to ventral portion of the lung caudal of the heart (the caudal sites), as well as the right parenchyma cranial to the heart (the cranial site). The maximal depth of consolidation (DEPTH) on TUS was recorded and noted separately for caudal and cranial sites. Different…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Berman et al. (2019) reported that TUS achieved an 89% sensitivity and 95% specificity for detecting consolidations deeper than 3 cm, excluding the area above the heart, in a study involving 209 calves and 30 pre-weaned dairy calves.
“Berman et al. (2019) reported that TUS achieved an 89% sensitivity and 95% specificity for detecting consolidations deeper than 3 cm, excluding the area above the heart, in a study involving 209 calves and 30 pre-weaned dairy calves.”
From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as Berman et al. (2019)
Cites
Lambert, P. C., Sutton, A. J., Burton, P. R., Abrams, K. R., & Jones, D. R. (2005) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2112 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Love, W. J., Lehenbauer, T. W., Kass, P. H., Van Eenennaam, A. L., & Aly, S. S. (2014) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.238 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
On-Farm Use of Ultrasonography for Bovine Respiratory Disease
Ollivett, T. L., & Buczinski, S. (2016) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.09.001 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Self-citationUltrasonography of the Bovine Respiratory System and Its Practical Application
Babkine, M., & Blond, L. (2009) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2009.07.001 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Buczinski, S., Fecteau, G., Dubuc, J., & Francoz, D. (2018) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.05.004 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bovine Respiratory Disease Diagnosis
Buczinski, S., & Pardon, B. (2020) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.03.004 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationStrategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview
Kamel, M. S., Davidson, J. L., & Verma, M. S. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14040627 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“Berman et al. (2019) reported that TUS achieved an 89% sensitivity and 95% specificity for detecting consolidations deeper than 3 cm, excluding the area above the heart, in a study involving 209 calves and 30 pre-weaned dairy calves.”
BackgroundMahendran, S. A. (2020) · Veterinary Record Open · doi:10.1136/vetreco-2020-000415 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Berman, J., Francoz, D., Dufour, S., & Buczinski, S.
- Affiliations
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Berman, J.
- Venue
- Preventive Veterinary Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 162
- Pages
- 38-45
- ISSN
- 0167-5877 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899358145
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preventive Veterinary Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Merck Animal Health Canada, Kirkland (RB002296)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vétérinaire (CHUV) of Saint-Hyacinthe, Canada and by Zoetis research support (SFMVRE78)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
- Keywords
- bovine respiratory disease, thoracic ultrasound, pre-weaned calves, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, latent class models, haptoglobin, veal calves, dairy calves, low prevalence, diagnostic test comparison, lung parenchyma, incremental diagnostic value, diagnostic cost-effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Newborn, Cattle, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thorax, Ultrasonography, Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review