Cited by 56Microbial infections and disease researchAnimal health and immunologyUltrasound in Clinical Applications

Bayesian Estimation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Systematic Thoracic Ultrasound Exam for Diagnosis of Bovine Respiratory Disease in Pre-Weaned Calves

Berman, J., Francoz, D., Dufour, S., Buczinski, S.·2019·Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Abstract

Among the different clinical presentations of bovine respiratory disease, active pneumonia, defined as an infection of the lower airway with signs of inflammation, is the most important to diagnose correctly so appropriate treatment can be initiated. Diagnostic tests that accurately identify cases of active pneumonia are lacking; however, thoracic ultrasonography (TUS) seems promising. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the accuracy of TUS compared to reference tests for the diagnosis of active pneumonia in pre-weaned calves, using a latent-class model method (LCM). The tests used for comparison were the Wisconsin Clinical Respiratory Scoring Chart (CRSC, positive if ≥5) and serum haptoglobin concentration (Hap, positive if ≥15 mg/dL). Secondary objectives were to assess the incremental value on TUS accuracy of combining TUS of the right cranial part and caudal parts, and to determine the accuracy of various thresholds for depth of consolidation (≥0 cm, ≥1 cm, or ≥3 cm) for diagnosis of active pneumonia. One population of veal calves (n = 209) and one of dairy calves (n = 301) were enrolled. TUS, CRSC and Hap were all performed on each calf on the same day. TUS was performed by screening the mid to ventral portion of the lung caudal of the heart (the caudal sites), as well as the right parenchyma cranial to the heart (the cranial site). The maximal depth of consolidation (DEPTH) on TUS was recorded and noted separately for caudal and cranial sites. Different…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.025

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Berman et al. (2019) reported that TUS achieved an 89% sensitivity and 95% specificity for detecting consolidations deeper than 3 cm, excluding the area above the heart, in a study involving 209 calves and 30 pre-weaned dairy calves.

    “Berman et al. (2019) reported that TUS achieved an 89% sensitivity and 95% specificity for detecting consolidations deeper than 3 cm, excluding the area above the heart, in a study involving 209 calves and 30 pre-weaned dairy calves.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berman, J., Francoz, D., Dufour, S., & Buczinski, S.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Berman, J.
Venue
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
162
Pages
38-45
ISSN
0167-5877 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899358145
Cited by
56
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Veterinary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Merck Animal Health Canada, Kirkland (RB002296)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vétérinaire (CHUV) of Saint-Hyacinthe, Canada and by Zoetis research support (SFMVRE78)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Keywords
bovine respiratory disease, thoracic ultrasound, pre-weaned calves, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, latent class models, haptoglobin, veal calves, dairy calves, low prevalence, diagnostic test comparison, lung parenchyma, incremental diagnostic value, diagnostic cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Cattle, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thorax, Ultrasonography, Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review