Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ammonia removal from anaerobically digested dairy manure by struvite precipitation

Open access
Uludag-Demirer, S., Demirer, G.N., Chen, S.·2005·Process Biochemistry

Abstract

Abstract Ammonia is one of the most important contaminants impairing the quality of water resources. When this is considered along with the fact that the global demand for nitrogenous fertilizers is in constant rise, the need for recovery as well as removal of nitrogen is well justified. Crystallization of N and P in the form of struvite (MgNH 4 PO 4 ·6H 2 O), which is a slow releasing and valuable fertilizer, is one possible technique for this purpose. This study investigated the removal of NH 4 + through struvite precipitation from the effluents of one- (R1) and two-phase (R2) anaerobic reactors digesting dairy manure. To force the formation of struvite in the anaerobic reactor effluents, Mg 2+ ion was added by using both Mg(OH) 2 and MgCl 2 ·6H 2 O. To prevent the effect of different total phosphorus (TP) concentration in the effluents of R1 and R2, as well as to not limit the formation of struvite, an excess amount of PO 4 3− (0.14 M) was added in the form of Na 2 HPO 4 . Different stoichiometric Mg 2+ :NH 4 + :PO 4 3− ratios were tested to determine the required Mg 2+ concentrations for maximum NH 4 + removal by keeping NH 4 + :PO 4 3− ratio constant for the effluents of reactors R1 and R2. The results revealed that very high NH 4 + removal efficiencies (above 95%) were possible by adding Mg 2+ ions higher than 0.06 M concentration in the effluents from reactors R1 and R2. It was also observed that the initial pH adjustment to 8.50 using NaOH did not result in any significant increase in the removal of NH 4 + and the removal of NH 4 + in the reactors treated with MgCl 2 ·6H 2 O was higher than those treated with Mg(OH) 2 for the same Mg 2+ concentration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.02.028

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Uludag-Demirer, S., Demirer, G. N., & Chen, S.
Venue
Process Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
3667-3674
ISSN
  • 0032-9592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1359-5113
OpenAlex
W1992167331
Cited by
259
References
24
FWCI
17.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ammonia removal from anaerobically digested dairy manure by struvite precipitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.02.028
The paper
Uludag-Demirer, S., Demirer, G. N., & Chen, S. (2005). Ammonia removal from anaerobically digested dairy manure by struvite precipitation. Process Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.02.028

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.