Microwave hydrodiffusion and gravity processing of Sargassum muticum
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MAE process conditions are suitable for thermolabile compounds.
“Also, process conditions are suitable for thermolabile compounds [72].”
From Overview on the Application of Modern Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae (2018) · cites this paper as [72]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Pérez, L., Conde, E., & Domínguez, H.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de Vigo (ES)
- Venue
- Process Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 981-988
- ISSN
- 0032-9592 (ISSN-L)
- 1359-5113
- OpenAlex
- W1998472746
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Process Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Xunta de Galicia
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
- Keywords
- Sargassum muticum, autohydrolysis, enzymatic extraction, phenolic compounds, antioxidants, ABTS radical scavenging, microwave power, seaweed extract
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
