Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Experimental and numerical study, under LTC conditions, of ammonia ignition delay with and without hydrogen addition

Open access
Pochet, Maxime, Dias, Véronique, Moreau, Bruno, Foucher, Fabrice, Jeanmart, Hervé, Contino, Francesco·2019·Proceedings of the Combustion Institute

Abstract

Abstract For long-term storage, part of the excess renewable energy can be stored into various fuels, among which ammonia and hydrogen show a high potential. To improve the power-to-fuel-to-power overall efficiency and reduce NOx emissions, the intrinsic properties of Low Temperature Combustion (LTC) engines could be used to convert these carbon-free fuels back into electricity and heat. Yet, ignition delay times for ammonia are not available at relevant LTC conditions. This lack of fundamental kinetic knowledge leads to uncertain ignition delay predictions by the existing ammonia kinetic mechanisms and prevents from determining optimal LTC running conditions. Using a Rapid Compression Machine (RCM), we have studied the ignition delay of ammonia with hydrogen addition (0%, 10%, and 25%vol.) under LTC conditions: low equivalence ratios (0.2, 0.35, 0.5), high pressures (43 and 65 bar) and low temperatures (1000–1100 K). This paper presents the comparison of the experimental data with simulation results obtained with five kinetic mechanisms found in the literature. It then provides a sensitivity analysis to highlight the most influencing reactions on the ignition of the ammonia-hydrogen blends. The obtained range of ignition delays for pure ammonia and for the ammonia-hydrogen blends prove their suitability for LTC engines. Still the hydrogen addition must be greater than 10%vol. to produce a significant promotion of the ignition delay. The two best performing mechanisms still predict too long ignition delays for pure ammonia, while the delays become too short for ammonia-hydrogen blends. A third mechanism captures correctly the relative influence of hydrogen addition, but is globally over-reactive. Through a sensitivity analysis, H 2 NO has been identified as the main cause for the under-reactive pure ammonia kinetics and N 2 H x has been identified as the main cause for globally over-reactive ammonia-hydrogen mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.138

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Pochet, M., Dias, V., Moreau, B., Foucher, F., Jeanmart, H., & Contino, F.
Venue
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
621-629
ISSN
1540-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808210501
Cited by
228
References
0
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental and numerical study, under LTC conditions, of ammonia ignition delay with and without hydrogen addition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.138
The paper
Pochet, M., Dias, V., Moreau, B., Foucher, F., Jeanmart, H., & Contino, F. (2019). Experimental and numerical study, under LTC conditions, of ammonia ignition delay with and without hydrogen addition. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.138

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.