Cited by 410Digital Transformation in IndustryFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing SystemsSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G

Software-defined Cloud Manufacturing for Industry 4.0

Open access
Thames, Lane, Schaefer, Dirk·2016·Procedia CIRP

Abstract

Many of the world's leading industrial nations have invested in national initiatives to foster advanced manufacturing, innovation, and design for the globalized world. Much of this investment has been driven by visions such as Industry 4.0, striving to achieve a future where intelligent factories and smart manufacturing are the norm. Within this realm, innovations such as the Industrial Internet of Things, Cloud-based Design and Manufacturing (CBDM), and Social Product Development (SPD) have emerged with a focus on capitalizing on the benefits and economies of scale provided by Internet Protocol (IP) communication technologies. Another emerging idea is the notion of software-defined systems such as software-defined networks, which exploit abstraction and inexpensive hardware advancements in an effort to build more flexible systems. Recently, the authors have begun considering how the notion of software-defined systems might be harnessed to achieve flexible cloud manufacturing systems. As a result, this paper introduces the notion of Software-Defined Cloud Manufacturing (SDCM). We describe a basic SDCM architecture based on leveraging abstraction between manufacturing hardware and cloud-based applications, services, and platforms. The goal of SDCM is to advance Cloud-Based Manufacturing and other Industry 4.0 pillars by providing agility, flexibility, and adaptability while also reducing various complexity challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.041

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. M. Hatch, (2014), "The Maker Movement Manifesto", McGraw-Hill Education, ISBN-10: 0071821120

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thames, L., & Schaefer, D.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Schaefer, Dirk
Venue
Procedia CIRP
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016
Volume
52
Pages
12-17
ISSN
2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2516274974
Cited by
410
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 12 · 2015: 1
FWCI
44.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
Keywords
Industry 4.0, software-defined networking, flexible manufacturing systems, Industrial Internet of Things, smart manufacturing, manufacturing system architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review