CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24Quality and Supply ManagementManagement and Optimization TechniquesDigital Transformation in Industry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact Analyses of Lean Production Systems

Open access
Dombrowski, U., Ebentreich, D., Krenkel, P.·2016·Procedia CIRP
DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.105
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Today's business conditions are characterized by increased competition. Therefore, enterprises have to cope with shorter product life cycles, higher product complexity and more product variants. The reaction of many enterprises is to implement lean production systems. In the past, methods of Lean Production Systems (LPS) have been used to identify waste in production and product development processes. Lean offers an approach to eliminate waste and increase customer value in all processes. The selection of the methods contained in LPS can be individually adapted to the respective requirements and conditions of the corresponding enterprise. Therefore, the identification of the necessary methods is an individual decision for each LPS. The consideration of the methods effects within the socio-technical system of a LPS is crucial because the effects of the different LPS methods provide important information for decision support. Thus, the paper describes the identification of interdependencies and effects in the LPS using System Dynamics. For this purpose, the modeling process of the method SMED is considered as an example. As a result, the interdependencies of the methods are identified and the methods with the amount of connections can be determined.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.105

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure: Lean production systems – basic principles, introduction, and review. Band 1. Berlin: Beuth Verlag 2012.
  2. Kurz, W.: Industrial Dynamics - Eine Einführung aus dem Bereich der erstmaligen Installation einer elektronischen Datenverarbeitungsanlage. Dissertation der Universität Mannheim. Mannheim: 1970.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dombrowski, U., Ebentreich, D., & Krenkel, P.
Corresponding author
Ebentreich, D.
Venue
Procedia CIRP
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016
Volume
57
Pages
607-612
ISSN
2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.105
OpenAlex
W2568205082
Cited by
24
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
lean manufacturing, impact analysis, system dynamics modeling, SMED, single-minute exchange of die, waste elimination, socio-technical systems, decision support, production process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review