Cited by 18Robot Manipulation and LearningRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsRobotic Path Planning Algorithms

Combining safety and speed in collaborative assembly systems—An approach to time optimal trajectories for collaborative robots

Open access
Rojas, Rafael A., Garcia, Manuel A. Ruiz, Gualtieri, Luca, Rauch, Erwin·2021·Procedia CIRP

Abstract

Human-robot interaction is a key enabling technology of Industry 4.0 and the prospected pervasiveness of robotics in industrial environments will be not possible without enabling them to safety interact with humans. Such a fact imposes a relevant constraints because the limits imposed by the actual technical deliverables entail strong requirements in the operational velocity of robots when sharing their workspace with humans. In this paper, we address the theoretical limits of velocity under the light of current state-of-the-art trajectory planning and normative requirements. The main goal is to find a methodology to plan safe trajectories without neglecting cognitive ergonomics and production efficiency aspects. We start by considering the set of trajectories which are optimal with respect to a cognitive criteria and give a suitable parametrization to it. Then we are able to formulate the safety requirements in terms of constraints in an optimization problem. Finally, experimental results are provided. This allow the identification of the preferable sets of possible motions which satisfy the operator psychological wellbeing and the assembly process performance by complying the safety requirements in terms of mechanical risk prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procir.2020.08.003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The task's execution time was reduced by 13.1% regarding the robot's default planner and 19.6% concerning the minimum jerk smooth collaboration planner.

    “The task's execution time was reduced by 13.1% regarding the robot's default planner and 19.6% concerning the minimum jerk smooth collaboration planner.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Arai, T. , Kato, R. , Fujita, M. , 2010. Assessment of operator stress induced by robot collaboration in assembly. CIRP Ann. 59 (1), 5-8 .
  2. De Luca, A. , Farina, R. , 2002. Dynamic scaling of trajectories for robots with elas- tic joints. In: Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 02CH37292), 3. IEEE, pp. 2436-2442 .
  3. Flash, T. , Hogan, N. , 1985. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J. Neurosci. 5 (7), 1688-1703 .
  4. Garcia, M.A.R. , Rojas, R.A. , Pirri, F. , 2019. Object-centered teleoperation of mobile manipulators with remote center of motion constraint. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 4 (2), 1745-1752 .
  5. Gasparetto, A. , Boscariol, P. , Lanzutti, A. , Vidoni, R. , 2012. Trajectory planning in robotics. Math. Comput. Sci. 6 (3), 269-279 .
  6. Gasparetto, A. , Zanotto, V. , 2007. A new method for smooth trajectory planning of robot manipulators. Mech. Mach. Theory 42 (4), 455-471 .
  7. Gualtieri, L. , Rojas, R. , Carabin, G. , Palomba, I. , Rauch, E. , Vidoni, R. , Matt, D.T. , 2018. Advanced automation for SMES in the i4. 0 revolution: engineering education and employees training in the smart mini factory laboratory. In: 2018 IEEE In- ternational Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). IEEE, pp. 1111-1115 .
  8. Hollerbach, J.M. , 1984. Dynamic scaling of manipulator trajectories. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas.Control 106 (1), 102-106 .
  9. Kokabe, M. , Shibata, S. , Yamamoto, T. , 2008. Modeling of handling motion reflecting emotional state and its application to robots. In: Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference. IEEE, pp. 495-501 .
  10. Lasota, P.A. , Shah, J.A. , 2015. Analyzing the effects of human-aware motion planning on close-proximity human-robot collaboration. Hum. Factors 57 (1), 21-33 .
  11. Meirovitch, Y. , Bennequin, D. , Flash, T. , 2016. Geometrical invariance and smoothness maximization for task-space movement generation. IEEE Trans. Robot. 32 (4), 837-853 .
  12. Oguz, O.S. , Zhou, Z. , Glasauer, S. , Wollherr, D. , 2018. An inverse optimal control ap- proach to explain human arm reaching control based on multiple internal mod- els. Sci. Rep. 8 (1), 5583 .
  13. Or, C.K. , Duffy, V.G. , Cheung, C.C. , 2009. Perception of safe robot idle time in virtual reality and real industrial environments. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 39 (5), 807-812 .
  14. Rojas, R.A. , Garcia, M.A.R. , 2020. Implementation of industrial internet of things and cyber-physical systems in SMES for distributed and service-oriented control. In: Industry 4.0 for SMEs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 73-103 .
  15. Rojas, R.A. , Rauch, E. , Dallasega, P. , Matt, D.T. , 2018. Safe human-machine centered design of an assembly station in a learning factory environment. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management .
  16. Rojas, R.A. , Ruiz Garcia, M.A. , Wehrle, E. , Vidoni, R. , 2019. A variational approach to minimum-jerk trajectories for psychological safety in collaborative assembly stations. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 4 (2), 823-829 .
  17. Rojas, R.A. , Wehrle, E. , Vidoni, R. , 2020. A multicriteria motion planning approach for combining smoothness and speed in collaborative assembly systems. Appl. Sci. 10 (15), 5086 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rojas, R. A., Garcia, M. A. R., Gualtieri, L., & Rauch, E.
Affiliations
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
Corresponding author
Rojas, Rafael A.
Venue
Procedia CIRP
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
97
Pages
308-312
ISSN
2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3132166349
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Keywords
collaborative robots, human-robot interaction, time-optimal trajectory, trajectory planning, safety constraints, cognitive ergonomics, assembly systems, production efficiency, Industry 4.0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review