CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementDigital Transformation in IndustryManufacturing Process and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative benefits of the digital product passport and data sharing in remanufacturing

Open access
Szaller, Ádám, Gallina, Viola, Gal, Barna, Gaal, Alexander, Fries, Christian·2023·Procedia CIRP
DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2023.09.102
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As a part of the circular economy – which aims at closing the loop of materials – remanufacturing is getting more and more attention in recent years. With remanufacturing, companies are carrying out a recovery operation of used products with the aim of rebuilding a like-new condition. As various members of the supply chain are involved in this process, and product data needed for optimal operation is often missing, remanufacturing processes can become uncertain and hard to optimize. The goal of a new European Commission initiative, the digital product passport (DPP), is to facilitate information exchange between stakeholders, in order to reduce uncertainties. DPP, assigned to a product, could contain information about e.g., its origin, composition, repair and dismantling possibilities. In the paper, the essence of DPP is introduced, and a case study is presented to show the qualitative benefits of the increased amount of information about the product. A discrete event-based simulation model of three real production lines that are (re)manufacturing cylinder heads is presented. Experiments are also conducted, where quantitative benefits of using DPP are highlighted, such as decreasing unnecessary production time, increasing ratio of remanufactured parts and increasing output.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procir.2023.09.102

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL) and the Wuppertal Institute., Digital product passport: The ticket to achieving a climate neutral and circular european economy?
  2. Guth-Orlowski, 2022, Product passport pioneers: 5 with michele galatola, european commission

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Szaller, Á., Gallina, V., Gal, B., Gaal, A., & Fries, C.
Affiliations
  • HUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control (HU)
  • Fraunhofer Austria (AT)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation (DE)
Corresponding author
Szaller, Ádám
ORCID
Venue
Procedia CIRP
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023
Volume
120
Pages
928-933
ISSN
2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.procir.2023.09.102
OpenAlex
W4390827482
Cited by
25
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SZTAKI Publication Repository (Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Research Development and Innovation Office
  • European Commission (739592)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Keywords
digital product passport, remanufacturing, circular economy, data sharing, information sharing, production line simulation, production time reduction, supply chain uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review