The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bus Control Strategy Application: Case Study of Santiago Transit System
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures



Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Existing solutions primarily focus on post-event analysis or complex optimization algorithms that are difficult to deploy in real-world transit environments.”
From An IoT-Based Bus Bunching Prevention Framework Using Real-Time Headway Monitoring and Driver Intervention Mechanisms (2026) · cites this paper as Lizana et al. (2014)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Eberlein XJ, Wilson NHM, Bernstein D. The holding problem with real-time information available. Transportation Science 2001; 35(1), 1-18. · DOI
- Sun A, Hickman M. The holding problem at multiple holding stations. In: Hickman M, Mirchandani P, Voss S (eds.) Computer-aided Systems in Public Transport. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2008. p. 339-359. · DOI
- Daganzo CF, Pilachowski J. Reducing bunching with bus-to-bus cooperation. Transportation Research Part B 2011; 45(1), 267-277. · DOI
- Fu L, Liu, Q, Calamai, P. Real-time optimization model for dynamic scheduling of transit operations. Transportation Research Record 2003; 1857, 48-55. · DOI
- Sun A, Hickman M. The real–time stop–skipping problem. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 2005; 9(2), 91-109. · DOI
- Delgado F, Muñoz JC, Giesen R. How much can holding and limiting boarding improve transit performance?. Transportation Research Part B 2012; 46(9) 1202-1217. · DOI
- Cortés CE, Saéz D, Milla F, Nuñez A, Riquelme M. Hybrid predictive control for real-time optimization of public transport system's operations based on evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Transportation Research Part C 2010; 18 (5), 757-769. · DOI
- Ceder A. Bus timetables with even passenger loads as opposed to even headways. Transportation Research Record 2001; 1760, 3-9. · DOI
- Zhao J, Dessouky M, Bukkapatnam S. Optimal slack time for schedule-based transit operations. Transportation Science 2006; 40(4), 529-539. · DOI
- Barnett A. On controlling randomness in transit operations. Transportation Science 1974; 8 (2), 102-116. · DOI
- Turnquist M, Blume S. Evaluating potencial effectiveness of headway control strategies for transit systems. Transportation Research Record 1980; 746, 25-29.
- Ding Y, Chien S, 2001. Improving transit service quality and headway regularity with real-time control. Transportation Research Record 2001; 1760,161-170. · DOI
- Zhao J, Bukkapatnam S, Dessouky M. Distributed architecture for real-time coordination of bus holding in transit networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2003; 4(1), 43-51. · DOI
- Bartholdi III JJ, Einstein DD. A self-coordinating bus route to resist bus bunching. Transportation Research Part B 2012; 46 (4), 481-491. · DOI
- Daganzo CF. A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: Systematic analysis and comparisons. Transportation Research Part B 2009; 43(10), 913-921. · DOI · Paper page
- Munizaga MA, Palma C. Estimation of a disaggregate multimodal public transport origin-destination matrix from passive Smart card data from Santiago, Chile. Transportation Research Part C 2012; 24, 9-18. · DOI
Cited by
A predictive-control framework to address bus bunching
Andres, M., & Nair, R. (2017) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.013 · Cited by 95
Mazwir, M. N., Ajib, N. A., & Harum, N. (2026) · International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science · doi:10.47772/ijriss.2026.100800942
Metadata
- Authors
- Lizana, P., Muñoz, J. C., Giesen, R., & Delgado, F.
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 397-404
- ISSN
- 1877-0509
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.