The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance Analysis of Classifier Models to Predict Diabetes Mellitus
Open accessAbstract
Diabetes is one of the common and growing diseases in several countries and all of them are working to prevent this disease at early stage by predicting the symptoms of diabetes using several methods. The main aim of this study is to compare the performance of algorithms those are used to predict diabetes using data mining techniques. In this paper we compare machine learning classifiers (J48 Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Random Forest, Support Vector Machines) to classify patients with diabetes mellitus. These approaches have been tested with data samples downloaded from UCI machine learning data repository. The performances of the algorithms have been measured in both the cases i.e dataset with noisy data (before pre-processing) and dataset set without noisy data (after pre-processing) and compared in terms of Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Machine-learning-based disease diagnosis: a comprehensive review
Ahsan, M. M., Luna, S. A., & Siddique, Z. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10030541 · Cited by 603
Metadata
- Authors
- Kandhasamy, J. P., & Balamurali, S.
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 47
- Pages
- 45-51
- ISSN
- 1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W807187018
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Analysis of Classifier Models to Predict Diabetes Mellitus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.182
- The paper
- Kandhasamy, J. P., & Balamurali, S. (2015). Performance Analysis of Classifier Models to Predict Diabetes Mellitus. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
