Fitness Function Based Sensor Degradation Estimation Using H∞ Filter
Open accessAbstract
In a practical scenario, sensors are used for health monitoring, condition monitoring of systems, weather, etc. but it is highly probable that the sensor itself degrades. This degradation in the sensors causes erroneous true negative results. Therefore, to improve the reliability and eliminate incorrect data, it is important to gauge the health of sensor and periodically determine its’ degradation level to change it within stipulated time. This paper introduces an efficient method to estimate the level of sensor degradation using its fitness function, which will indicate the level of fitness of the sensor to be used and estimate the future values from the fitness function. H∞ filter based estimation theory is used to predict the future values of the fitness function of the sensors. Thus, to maintain the desired value and right turnout, an Automatic Gain Controller circuit is explained which helps us suggest to put back the degraded sensor. The results are presented along with the estimated fitness function.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Less attention has been given to fusing degradation data from multiple sensors, and data fusion algorithms can be implemented for multi-sensor degradation systems.
“Furthermore, less attention has been given to fusing degradation data from multiple sensors, multiple sensor data, and data fusion algorithms can be implemented for multi-sensor degradation systems (Arosh et al., 2015).”
From Impact of Sensor Degradation on Measurement Uncertainty in Prognostics and Maintenance Decision-Making: (2025) · cites this paper as Arosh et al., 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thai, T.-T. N., Do, P., Iung, B., & Gardoni, P. (2025) · International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management · doi:10.36001/ijphm.2025.v16i4.4306 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Arosh, S., Suryaprakash, Nayak, S. K., & Duttagupta, S. P.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Duttagupta, S.P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 172-177
- ISSN
- 1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1737134665
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Keywords
- fitness function, H-infinity filtering, sensor health monitoring, condition monitoring, automatic gain control, sensor reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review