Cited by 17Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisData Management and AlgorithmsRecommender Systems and Techniques

Tweet-mapping Method for Tourist Spots Based on Now-Tweets and Spot-photos

Open access
Oku, Kenta, Hattori, Fumio, Kawagoe, Kyoji·2015·Procedia Computer Science

Abstract

Tourism recommender systems suggest suitable tourist spots by matching the characteristics of the tourist spots with those of the user. In this paper, we focus on an essential source of these characteristics—geotagged tweets. To solve the problem of associating geotagged tweets to tourist spots, we propose a mapping method that infers the region of a target spot on the basis of two geotagged items. The first is a geotagged tweet, which demonstrates that the tweeter was indeed at the target spot at the time the tweet was posted. We call this a “now-tweet.” The second item is a geotagged photo of the target spot, which we call a “spot-photo.” We regard these now-tweets and spot-photos as training data, and then determine the region of the tourist spot by inferring the geographical distribution of the training data. Next, we map geotagged tweets from the extracted region to the target spot. To improve the accuracy with which the tourist spot is inferred, we apply a clustering algorithm to the training data. Experimental results indicate that photo-based mapping with sophisticated training data produces the most improved performance over baseline methods. When applied to 4,559,643 geotagged tweets, our method maps them to tourist spots with an average granularity of 144.85 m.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.202

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most existing methods for analysing social media data focus on predefined specific questions rather than developing a general understanding of tourists' movement, interests and experiences.

    “Most of the existing methods for analysing social media data are focused on finding answers to specific questions that are predefined in their studies (e.g. [10; 53]) and not on developing a general understanding of tourists' movement, interests and experiences (e.g. [41; 77]).”

    From A Big Data Analytics Method for Tourist Behaviour Analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [53]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oku, K., Hattori, F., & Kawagoe, K.
Affiliations
Ritsumeikan University (JP)
Corresponding author
Oku, Kenta
Venue
Procedia Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015
Volume
60
Pages
1318-1327
ISSN
1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613160978
Cited by
17
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K12151)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Data Management and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
geo-tagged tweets, tourism recommender systems, location inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review