Cited by 65

Human Mobility Modelling: Exploration and Preferential Return Meet the Gravity Model

Pappalardo, Luca, Rinzivillo, Salvatore, Simini, Filippo·2016·Procedia Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.188

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human mobility is known to follow certain universal principles, such as scaling laws of mobility.

    “Still, human mobility is known to follow certain universal principles, such as scaling laws of mobility (Alessandretti et al. 2020;Pappalardo et al. 2016;Song et al. 2010b), which suggests that our findings may reflect more general behavioral regularities.”

    From Visitation patterns across mobility groups: wandering, commuting, and exploring (2026) · cites this paper as Pappalardo et al. 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. D. Karamshuk, C. Boldrini, M. Conti, and A. Passarella, "Human mobility models for opportunistic networks," Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 49, pp. 157-165, December 2011.
  2. C. Song, T. Koren, P. Wang, and A.-L. Barabási, "Modelling the scaling properties of human mobility," Nature Physics, vol. 6, pp. 818-823, Sept. 2010.
  3. H. Barbosa, F. B. de Lima-Neto, A. Evsukoff, and R. Menezes, "The effect of recency to human mobility," EPJ Data Science, vol. 4, no. 21, 2015.
  4. M. C. González, C. A. Hidalgo, and A.-L. Barabási, "Understanding individual human mobility patterns," Nature, vol. 453, pp. 779-782, June 2008.
  5. S. Isaacman, R. Becker, R. Cáceres, M. Martonosi, J. Rowland, A. Varshavsky, and W. Willinger, "Human mobility modeling at metropolitan scales," in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, MobiSys '12, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 239-252, ACM, 2012.
  6. G. K. Zipf, "The p1p2/d hypothesis: On the intercity movement of persons," American Sociological Review, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 677-686, 1946.
  7. W. S. Jung, F. Wang, and H. E. Stanley, "Gravity model in the korean highway," EPL (Europhysics Letters), vol. 81, p. 48005, 2008.
  8. A. G. Wilson, "The use of entropy maximising models, in the theory of trip distribution, mode split and route split," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, pp. 108-126, 1969.
  9. F. Simini, M. C. González, A. Maritan, and A. L. Barabási, "A universal model for mobility and migration patterns," Nature, vol. 484, p. 96, 2012.
  10. D. Balcan, V. Colizza, B. Gonc ¸alves, H. Hu, J. J. Ramasco, and A. Vespignani, "Multiscale mobility networks and the spatial spreading of infectious diseases," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 106, no. 51, p. 21484, 2009.
  11. L. Pappalardo, S. Rinzivillo, Z. Qu, D. Pedreschi, and F. Giannotti, "Understanding the patterns of car travel," The European Physical Journal Special Topics, vol. 215, no. 1, pp. 61-73, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pappalardo, L., Rinzivillo, S., & Simini, F.
Venue
Procedia Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016
Volume
83
Pages
934-939
ISSN
1877-0509
Cited by
65
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review