The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of Hate Speech Text in Hindi-English Code-mixed Data
Open accessAbstract
Social media sites like Twitter, Facebook, being user-friendly and a free source, provide opportunities to people to air their voice. People, irrespective of the age group, use these sites to share every moment of their life making these sites flooded with data. Apart from these commendable features, these sites have down side as well. Due to lack of restrictions set by these sites for its users to express their views as they like, anybody can make adverse and unrealistic comments in abusive language against anybody with an ulterior motive to tarnish one’s image and status in the society. So it became a huge responsibility for the Government and these sites to identify this hate content before it disseminates to mass. Automatic hate speech detection faces quite a lot of challenges due to the non-standard variations in spelling and grammar. Especially for a country like India with huge multilingual and bilingual population, this hate content would be in code-mixed form which makes the task demanding. So our paper projects a machine learning model to detect hate speech in Hindi-English code-mixed social media text. The methodology makes use of Facebook’s pre-trained word embedding library, fastText to represent 10000 data samples collected from different sources as hate and non-hate. The performance of the proposed methodology is compared with word2vec and doc2vec features and it is observed that fastText features gave better feature representation with Support Vector Machine (SVM)-Radial Basis Funcrion (RBF) classifier. The paper also provides an insight to the researchers working in the field of code-mixed data that character level features provide best result for code-mixed data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Long Short-Term Memory Networks with Attention (LSTM-Att): By fusing the capacity of LSTMs to capture long-term dependencies in sequential data with the interpretability of attention mechanisms, the model has demonstrated promising results in the detection of cyberbullying.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [120]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Therefore, LSTM-Att might be a powerful tool for enhancing the precision of automated systems to detect cyberbullies [120].”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [120]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information
Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., & Mikolov, T. (2017) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00051 · Cited by 9,645
Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification
Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., & Mikolov, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-2068 · Cited by 4,545
Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora
Rek, R. R. U., & Sojka, P. (2010) · doi:10.13140/2.1.2393.1847 · Cited by 3,789
Learning Sentiment-Specific Word Embedding for Twitter Sentiment Classification
Tang, D., Wei, F., Yang, N., Zhou, M., Liu, T., & Qin, B. (2014) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1146 · Cited by 1,181
A Dataset of Hindi-English Code-Mixed Social Media Text for Hate Speech Detection
Bohra, A., Vijay, D., Singh, V. K., Akhtar, S. S., & Shrivastava, M. (2018) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-1105 · Cited by 272
Machine Learning with SVM and other Kernel methods
Soman, K. P., Loganathan, R., & Ajay (2009) · Cited by 238
Self-citationDETECTION OF HATE SPEECH IN SOCIAL NETWORKS: A SURVEY ON MULTILINGUAL CORPUS
Alhassan, A., & Al-Dossari, H. Z. (2019) · doi:10.5121/csit.2019.90208 · Cited by 188
"I am borrowing ya mixing ?" An Analysis of English-Hindi Code Mixing in Facebook
Bali, K., Sharma, J., Choudhury, M., & Vyas, Y. (2014) · Workshop on Computational Approaches to Code Switching · doi:10.3115/v1/w14-3914 · Cited by 183
Cyberhate: A review and content analysis of intervention strategies
Blaya, C. (2018) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.006 · Cited by 159
Did you offend me? Classification of Offensive Tweets in Hinglish Language
Mathur, P., Sawhney, R., Ayyar, M. P., & Shah, R. R. (2018) · Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5118 · Cited by 126
Hate Speech Detection in Hindi-English Code-Mixed Social Media Text
Santosh, T. Y. S. S., & Aravind, K. V. S. (2019) · doi:10.1145/3297001.3297048 · Cited by 107
Sentiment analysis using convolutional neural network with fastText embeddings
Santos, I., Nedjah, N., & Mourelle, L. D. M. (2017) · IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI) · doi:10.1109/la-cci.2017.8285683 · Cited by 93
Hate Speech Detection from Code-mixed Hindi-English Tweets Using Deep Learning ModelsPreprint
Satyajit, K., & Joshi, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.05145 · Cited by 70
A deep learning approach for Malayalam morphological analysis at character level
Premjith, B., Soman, K. P., & Kumar, M. A. (2018) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.058 · Cited by 53
Self-citationA comparative study on code-mixed data of Indian social media vs formal text
Ranjan, P., Raja, B., Priyadharshini, R., & Balabantaray, R. C. (2016) · International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I) · doi:10.1109/ic3i.2016.7918035 · Cited by 30
Amrita_CEN@FACT: Factuality Identification in Spanish Text
Premjith, B., Soman, K. P., & Poornachandran, P. (2019) · IberLEF@SEPLN · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Biere, Shanita, Sandjai Bhulai, and Master Business Analytics. (2018) "Hate Speech Detection Using Natural Language Processing Techniques". Diss. Master’s dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
- Santos, Igor, Nadia Nedjah, and Luiza de Macedo Mourelle. (2017) "Sentiment analysis using convolutional neural network with fastText embeddings." 2017 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI):1-5 · DOI
- Remmiya Devi, G" P.V. Veena, M. Anand Kumar, and K.P. Soman. (2016) "AMRITA-CEN® FIRE 2016: Code-mix entity extraction for Hindi-English and Tamil-English tweets." CEUR Workshop Proceedings:304-308.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cyberbullying detection for low-resource languages and dialects: Review of the state of the art
Mahmud, T., Ptaszynski, M. E., Eronen, J., & Masui, F. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103454 · Cited by 181
Subramanian, M., Easwaramoorthy, S. V., Deepalakshmi, G., Cho, J., & Manikandan, G. (2023) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.038 · Cited by 116
A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection
Hasan, M. T., Hossain, M. A. E., Mukta, M. S. H., Akter, A., Ahmed, M., & Islam, S. (2023) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi15050179 · Cited by 103
“Therefore, LSTM-Att might be a powerful tool for enhancing the precision of automated systems to detect cyberbullies [120].”
MethodFake Profile Detection on Social Networking Websites: A Comprehensive Review
Roy, P. K., & Chahar, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2021.3064901 · Cited by 100
Hate speech detection in social media: Techniques, recent trends, and future challenges
Rawat, A., Kumar, S., & Samant, S. S. (2024) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.1648 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Sreelakshmi, K., Premjith, B., & Soman, K. P.
- Affiliations
- Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Sreelakshmi, K
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 737-744
- ISSN
- 1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3032985518
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
- Keywords
- hate speech detection, Hindi-English code-mixing, social media text, FastText embeddings, word embeddings, character-level features, support vector machine, Gaussian kernel, multilingual text classification, abusive language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
