Enhancing Student Motivation with use of Augmented Reality for Interactive Learning in Engineering Education
Open accessAbstract
In Engineering Education, learning by doing is of paramount importance for supplementing the theoretical concepts with technical introduction to maximize the learning outcome. However, in many fields, the students are not able to apply their knowledge in practical ways in spite of having theoretical understanding of the fundamentals. This can be mainly attributed to the lack of motivation due to absence of interactive course content required for proper visualization of the concepts through student engagement in the classroom. As a result, deep understanding of the concepts is not possible for those who are unable to grasp the delivered content using traditional ways of learning. If the students are provided with such tools that they are able to visualize and interact with what is taught in the classroom, their motivation towards learning can be enhanced. Augmented Reality, being a visualization technology, can be adopted in classroom settings to fulfill this goal. This paper is focused on the use of Augmented Reality as a tool for interactive learning in various fields of engineering education, and its contribution towards student motivation in classroom scenarios.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many students lack the skill to implement their theoretical knowledge in real-world contexts because of a lack of visualisations of engineering concepts.
“In particular, many students lack the skill to implement their theoretical knowledge in real-world contexts because of a lack of visualisations of engineering concepts (Kaur et al. 2020).”
From Incorporating Computational Thinking Into Virtual Laboratories to Enhance Learning Motivation, Engagement, and Higher‐Order Thinking Skills (2025) · cites this paper as Kaur et al. 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 155
- Authors
- Kaur, D. P., Mantri, A., & Horan, B.
- Affiliations
- Chitkara University (IN)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 172
- Pages
- 881-885
- ISSN
- 1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3036912230
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Multimedia Learning Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- augmented reality, student motivation, interactive learning, engineering education, visualization, student engagement, classroom technology, hands-on learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
