Cited by 36Speech and dialogue systemsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in Service Interactions

AI-Powered Health Chatbots: Toward a general architecture

Open access
Khadija, Achtaich, Zahra, Fagroud Fatima, Naceur, Achtaich·2021·Procedia Computer Science

Abstract

A Chatbot is a conversational agent that simulate human conversation, through text or voice messages. One of the first goals of a Chatbot is to interact with the user just like a human. When it comes to Health Chatbots, another main goal is to be able to get the correct answer to the user request. In this paper we propose a general Architecture of an AI-Powered Health Chatbot with Four components to reach the two goals, which integrates dialogue and communication part in natural language understanding (NLU) and natural language generation (NLG), and the expert part based on deep learning whose function is to give appropriate response from pre-formatted data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procs.2021.07.048

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI-powered virtual assistants and chatbots lack the emotional depth and understanding of human healthcare providers.

    “While these tools can streamline communication and provide quick responses, they lack the emotional depth and understanding of human healthcare providers.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Shakhovska, K. (2017, December). Making answer algorithm for chat-bot. In Litteris et Artibus: матеріали (pp. 394-395). Видавництво Львівської політехніки.
  2. Collecchia, G. (2019). The doctor-patient relationship in the digital world: a Babylon?. Recenti progressi in medicina, 110(9), 397-400.
  3. 현영근, 임정택, 한정현, 채우리, 이기현, 고진덕, ... & 이주연. (2020). 사용자 친화적인 대화형 챗봇 구축을 위한 개발방법론에 관한 연구. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(11), 215-226.
  4. SAFDER, A., NAQVI, S. M. R., & SHAFIQUE, E. (2020). Automated Chatbot (Doctoral dissertation).

Authors
Khadija, A., Zahra, F. F., & Naceur, A.
Venue
Procedia Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
191
Pages
355-360
ISSN
1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198040720
Cited by
36
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
healthcare chatbots, chatbots, chatbot architecture, natural language understanding, natural language generation, deep learning, dialogue systems, expert systems, medical information retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review