CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40Information Technology Governance and StrategyInformation Systems Education and Curriculum DevelopmentOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IT service management evaluation method based on content, context, and process approach: A literature review

Open access
Widianto, Ari, Subriadi, Apol Pribadi·2022·Procedia Computer Science
DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.157
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The main purpose of implementing Information Technology Service Management (ITSM) is to accomplish high service quality. ITSM evaluation is not an easy matter because of its scale and complexity. Choosing the right evaluation method is essential, so it fits the goals and objectives. This paper aims to analyze ITSM evaluation studies to provide useful information for practitioners and researchers. The research method uses a systematic literature review related to ITSM evaluation supported by seven selected academic databases. Several categories of ITSM evaluation are based on content, context, and process by adopting the CCP framework in research results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.157

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 2 . Fig. 2. Frequency of focus evaluation.
Fig. 2 . Fig. 2. Frequency of focus evaluation.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Fig. 6 . Fig. 6. Frequency of reason to ITSM evaluation.
Fig. 6 . Fig. 6. Frequency of reason to ITSM evaluation.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Melendez, 2016, "Information technology service management models applied to medium and small organizations: A systematic literature review.", Computer Standards and Interfaces, 47, 120, 10.1016/j.csi.2015.10.001 · DOI
  2. Mesquida, 2012, "IT service management process improvement based on ISO/IEC 15504: A systematic review.", Information and Software Technology, 54, 239, 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.11.002 · DOI
  3. Ruiz, 2018, "Using simulation-based optimization in the context of IT service management change process.", Decision Support Systems, 112, 35, 10.1016/j.dss.2018.06.004 · DOI
  4. Obwegeser, 2019, "Continual Process Improvement for ITIL Service Operations: A Lean Perspective.", Information Systems Management, 36, 141, 10.1080/10580530.2019.1587576 · DOI
  5. Stockdale, 2006, "An interpretive approach to evaluating information systems: A content, context, process framework.", European Journal of Operational Research, 173, 1090, 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.006 · DOI
  6. Okoli, 2012, "A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research.", SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2115818 · DOI
  7. Silva, N., M.M. Da Silva, B. Barafort, M. Vicente, and P. Sousa. (2015) “Using ArchiMate to model a process assessment framework.” Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 13-17-April 1189–1194. · DOI
  8. Cronholm, 2014, "Measures that matters: Service quality in IT service management.", International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 6, 60, 10.1108/IJQSS-12-2012-0022 · DOI
  9. Freitas, 2018, "Assessing the quality of information technology infrastructure services.", Industrial Management and Data Systems, 118, 1821, 10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0415 · DOI
  10. Herdiyanti, 2017, "Understanding the Quality Gap of Information Technology Services from the Perspective of Service Provider and Consumer.", Procedia Computer Science, 124, 601, 10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.195 · DOI
  11. Shrestha, 2016, "Innovative decision support for IT service management.", Journal of Decision Systems, 25, 486, 10.1080/12460125.2016.1187424 · DOI
  12. Shrestha, 2018, "Benefits and relevance of International Standards in a design science research project for process assessments.", Computer Standards and Interfaces, 60, 48, 10.1016/j.csi.2018.04.011 · DOI
  13. Shrestha, 2020, "Development and evaluation of a software-mediated process assessment method for IT service management.", Information and Management, 57, 10.1016/j.im.2019.103213 · DOI
  14. Rennung, 2014, "Evaluation of Methods for Customer Integration to the Quality of IT Services.", Procedia Technology, 16, 101, 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.073 · DOI
  15. Herdiyanti, 2017, "Understanding the Total Value of Information Technology Services from the Perspective of Students and Academic Staffs.", Procedia Computer Science, 124, 429, 10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.174 · DOI
  16. Yamamoto, 2017, "A Continuous Approach to Improve IT Management.", Procedia Computer Science, 121, 27, 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.005 · DOI
  17. Gacenga, 2010, "An international analysis of IT service management benefits and performance measurement.", Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13, 28, 10.1080/1097198X.2010.10856525 · DOI
  18. Barafort, 2018, "A software artefact to support standard-based process assessment: Evolution of the TIPA® framework in a design science research project.", Computer Standards and Interfaces, 60, 37, 10.1016/j.csi.2018.04.009 · DOI
  19. Kundu, 2012, "A unified model for implementing lean and CMMI for Services (CMMI‐SVC v1.3) best practices.", Asian Journal on Quality, 13, 138, 10.1108/15982681211265463 · DOI
  20. Bairi, 2012, "Capacity and availability management by quantitative project management in the IT service industry.", Asian Journal on Quality, 13, 163, 10.1108/15982681211265472 · DOI
  21. Bin-Abbas, 2014, "Assessment of IT governance in organizations: A simple integrated approach.", Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 261, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.019 · DOI
  22. Bairi, 2011, "Critical success factors in gaining user customer satisfaction in outsourced IT services.", Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 24, 475, 10.1108/17410391111166530 · DOI
  23. Yamakawa, 2012, "Improving ITIL compliance using change management practices: A finance sector case study.", Business Process Management Journal, 18, 1020, 10.1108/14637151211283393 · DOI
  24. Lepmets, M., E. Ras, and A. Renault. (2011) “A quality measurement framework for IT services.” Proceedings - 2011 Annual SRII Global Conference, SRII 2011 767–774. · DOI
  25. Ordanini, 2010, "How does the application of an IT service innovation affect firm performance? A theoretical framework and empirical analysis on e-commerce.", Information and Management, 47, 60, 10.1016/j.im.2009.10.003 · DOI
  26. Närman, 2013, "Using enterprise architecture analysis and interview data to estimate service response time.", Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22, 70, 10.1016/j.jsis.2012.10.002 · DOI
  27. Siti-Nabiha, 2012, "A case study of service desk’s performance measurement system.", International Journal of Commerce and Management, 22, 103, 10.1108/10569211211239412 · DOI
  28. Dahiya, 2016, "IT assets, IT infrastructure performance and IT capability: a framework for e-government.", Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10, 411, 10.1108/TG-07-2015-0031 · DOI · Paper page
  29. McNaughton, 2010, "Designing an evaluation framework for IT service management.", Information and Management, 47, 219, 10.1016/j.im.2010.02.003 · DOI
  30. Barafort, 2018, "A software artefact to support standard-based process assessment: Evolution of the TIPA® framework in a design science research project.", Computer Standards and Interfaces, 60, 37, 10.1016/j.csi.2018.04.009 · DOI
  31. Jia, 2013, "IT service climate, antecedents and IT service quality outcomes: Some initial evidence.", Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22, 51, 10.1016/j.jsis.2012.10.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Widianto, A., & Subriadi, A. P.
Affiliations
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ID)
Corresponding author
Subriadi, Apol Pribadi
ORCID
Subriadi, Apol Pribadi
Venue
Procedia Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022
Volume
197
Pages
410-419
ISSN
1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.157
OpenAlex
W4206842304
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4
FWCI
10.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Keywords
IT service management, assessment methods, service quality, IT service quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review