The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Hybrid Intelligent Approach for Network Intrusion Detection
Open accessAbstract
Intrusion detection is an emerging area of research in the computer security and networks with the growing usage of internet in everyday life. Most intrusion detection systems (IDSs) mostly use a single classifier algorithm to classify the network traffic data as normal behaviour or anomalous. However, these single classifier systems fail to provide the best possible attack detection rate with low false alarm rate. In this paper, we propose to use a hybrid intelligent approach using combination of classifiers in order to make the decision intelligently, so that the overall performance of the resultant model is enhanced. The general procedure in this is to follow the supervised or un-supervised data filtering with classifier or clusterer first on the whole training dataset and then the output is applied to another classifier to classify the data. We use 2-class classification strategy along with 10-fold cross validation method to produce the final classification results in terms of normal or intrusion. Experimental results on NSL-KDD dataset, an improved version of KDDCup 1999 dataset show that our proposed approach is efficient with high detection rate and low false alarm rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward Credible Evaluation of Anomaly-Based Intrusion-Detection Methods
Tavallaee, M., Stakhanova, N., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2048428 · Cited by 280
Cited by
Boutaba, R., Salahuddin, M. A., Limam, N., Ayoubi, S., Shahriar, N., Estrada-Solano, F., & Caicedo, O. M. (2018) · Journal of Internet Services and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13174-018-0087-2 · Cited by 1,036
Random Forest Modeling for Network Intrusion Detection System
Farnaaz, N., & Jabbar, M. A. (2016) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.06.047 · Cited by 684
Effective Intrusion Detection System Using XGBoost
Dhaliwal, S. S., Nahid, A.-A., & Abbas, R. (2018) · Information · doi:10.3390/info9070149 · Cited by 503
Intrusion detection model using fusion of chi-square feature selection and multi class SVM
Sumaiya Thaseen, I., & Aswani Kumar, C. (2017) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2015.12.004 · Cited by 465
Deep Learning and Dempster-Shafer Theory Based Insider Threat Detection
Tian, Z., Shi, W., Tan, Z., Qiu, J., Sun, Y., Jiang, F., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-020-01656-7 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Panda, M., Abraham, A., & Patra, M. R.
- Venue
- Procedia Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 1877-7058 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115569246
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Hybrid Intelligent Approach for Network Intrusion Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.827
- The paper
- Panda, M., Abraham, A., & Patra, M. R. (2012). A Hybrid Intelligent Approach for Network Intrusion Detection. Procedia Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.