The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intrusion detection model using fusion of chi-square feature selection and multi class SVM
Open accessAbstract
Intrusion detection is a promising area of research in the domain of security with the rapid development of internet in everyday life. Many intrusion detection systems (IDS) employ a sole classifier algorithm for classifying network traffic as normal or abnormal. Due to the large amount of data, these sole classifier models fail to achieve a high attack detection rate with reduced false alarm rate. However by applying dimensionality reduction, data can be efficiently reduced to an optimal set of attributes without loss of information and then classified accurately using a multi class modeling technique for identifying the different network attacks. In this paper, we propose an intrusion detection model using chi-square feature selection and multi class support vector machine (SVM). A parameter tuning technique is adopted for optimization of Radial Basis Function kernel parameter namely gamma represented by ‘ϒ’ and over fitting constant ‘C’. These are the two important parameters required for the SVM model. The main idea behind this model is to construct a multi class SVM which has not been adopted for IDS so far to decrease the training and testing time and increase the individual classification accuracy of the network attacks. The investigational results on NSL-KDD dataset which is an enhanced version of KDDCup 1999 dataset shows that our proposed approach results in a better detection rate and reduced false alarm rate. An experimentation on the computational time required for training and testing is also carried out for usage in time critical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
UCI Repository of machine learning databases
Blake, C. L. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,582
A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines
Hsu, C.-W., & Lin, C.-J. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.991427 · Cited by 6,838
A Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Text Categorization
Yang, Y., & Pedersen, J. (1997) · Cited by 4,790
A data mining framework for building intrusion detection models
Lee, W., Stolfo, S. J., & Mok, K. W. (2003) · Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No.99CB36344) · doi:10.1109/secpri.1999.766909 · Cited by 1,148
A Comparative Study of Anomaly Detection Schemes in Network Intrusion Detection
Lazarevic, A., Ertoz, L., Kumar, V., Ozgur, A., & Srivastava, J. (2003) · Proceedings of the 2003 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611972733.3 · Cited by 865
State transition analysis: a rule-based intrusion detection approach
Ilgun, K., Kemmerer, R. A., & Porras, P. A. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.372146 · Cited by 747
Feature deduction and ensemble design of intrusion detection systems
Chebrolu, S., Abraham, A., & Thomas, J. P. (2005) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2004.09.008 · Cited by 604
A novel hybrid intrusion detection method integrating anomaly detection with misuse detection
Kim, G., Lee, S., & Kim, S. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.066 · Cited by 589
A new approach to intrusion detection using Artificial Neural Networks and fuzzy clustering
Wang, G., Hao, J., Ma, J., & Huang, L. (2010) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.102 · Cited by 505
CANN: An intrusion detection system based on combining cluster centers and nearest neighbors
Lin, W.-C., Ke, S.-W., & Tsai, C.-F. (2015) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.01.009 · Cited by 484
Cited by
Network Intrusion Detection Combined Hybrid Sampling With Deep Hierarchical Network
Jiang, K., Wang, W., Wang, A., & Wu, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2973730 · Cited by 446
An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Intrusion Detection Systems
Wang, M., Zheng, K., Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988359 · Cited by 355
Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Survey
Zha, D., Bhat, Z. P., Lai, K.-H., Yang, F., Jiang, Z., Zhong, S., & Hu, X. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3711118 · Cited by 334
M-AdaBoost-A based ensemble system for network intrusion detection
Zhou, Y., Mazzuchi, T. A., & Sarkani, S. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113864 · Cited by 99
Gulzar, Q., & Mustafa, K. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-89650-5 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Sumaiya Thaseen, I., & Aswani Kumar, C.
- Venue
- Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 462-472
- ISSN
- 1319-1578 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2326324325
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 24.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrusion detection model using fusion of chi-square feature selection and multi class SVM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jksuci.2015.12.004
- The paper
- Sumaiya Thaseen, I., & Aswani Kumar, C. (2017). Intrusion detection model using fusion of chi-square feature selection and multi class SVM. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2015.12.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.