Competences-based Comparison and Ranking of Industrial Enterprises Using PROMETHEE Method
Open accessAbstract
New organizational concepts like manufacturing networks or production networks, or even everyday enterprise's task like supplier selection, require comparison and ranking of some enterprises. A proper comparison method and procedure needs to be established. In this research a procedure for comparison and ranking of industrial enterprises is based on enterprise's competences. For each enterprise a special set of competences has been defined and evaluation for each competence has been made. These evaluations were submitted to PROMETHEE method and ranking results were obtained. The results show that it is possible to design transparent comparison and ranking procedure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lack of coordination between security team and DevOps team is a DevOps security challenge.
“The challenging factor lack of coordination between security team and DevOps team is causing more security threats like untrusted inputs [54], [55], [74].”
From Prioritization based taxonomy of DevOps security challenges using PROMETHEE (2020) · cites this paper as [55]
Cites
Prométhée: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis
Mareschal, B., Brans, J. P., & Vincke, P. (1984) · Cited by 631 · see citing works
The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid
Brans, J. P., & Mareschal, B. (1994) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/0167-9236(94)90048-5 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Perić, T., Babić, Z., & Veža, I. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1080/0951192x.2013.799778 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Optimization of the selection of competence cells in regional production network
Mladineo, M., Veža, I., & Čorkalo, A. (2011) · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Criteria for selection of cooperators in a regional production network
Veža, I., & Babić, Z. (2013) · International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icadlt.2013.6568512 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Competitiveness increasing of enterprises with introduction of clusters
Peronja, I., Veža, I., Čuš, F., Gjeldum, N., & Bilić, B. (2010) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationTadić, I., & Marasović, B. (2013) · Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Production Networks and Partner Selection Problem
Veža, I., Mladineo, M., & Gjeldum, N. (2013) · DAAAM international scientific book ... · doi:10.2507/daaam.scibook.2013.28 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prioritization based taxonomy of DevOps security challenges using PROMETHEE
Rafi, S., Yu, W., Akbar, M. A., Alsanad, A., & Gumaei, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2998819 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Wu, Y., Sun, X., Lü, Z., Zhou, J., & Xu, C. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.091 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Nikolić, I., Milošević, I. M., Milijić, N., & Mihajlović, I. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.109 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
A Spherical Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Industry 4.0 Performance Measurement
Özdemir, Y. (2022) · Axioms · doi:10.3390/axioms11070325 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Navigating Supply Chain Resilience: A Hybrid Approach to Agri-Food Supplier Selection
Aungkulanon, P., Atthirawong, W., Luangpaiboon, P., & Chanpuypetch, W. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12101598 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Rafi, S., Akbar, M. A., Alsanad, A. A., AlSuwaidan, L., Al-Alshaikh, H. A., & AlSagri, H. S. (2022) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/2600160 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Park, D., Kim, Y., Um, M., & Choi, S. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su70810233 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Supplier selection using multi-criteria decision making methods: a comprehensive review
Chakraborty, S., Raut, R. D., Rofin, T. M., & Chakraborty, S. (2025) · OPSEARCH · doi:10.1007/s12597-025-01009-6 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Research on the Dynamic Evaluation of the Competitiveness of Listed Seed Enterprises in China
Li, L., Zhang, L., & Wang, X. (2024) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture14081213 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ke, C.-K., & Chang, C.-M. (2019) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-019-02963-x · Cited by 4 · see citing works
TÜRK HAVACILIK SEKTÖRÜNÜN ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YÖNTEMLERİYLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: 2002-2022 DÖNEMİ
Avşar, İ. İ. (2023) · Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.29029/busbed.1295361 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Evaluación de la monumentalidad de árboles urbanos en México
Velazco, N. A. M., Lozano, J. L. R., Villanueva‐Morales, A., & la Rosa, A. B.-D. (2020) · Revista mexicana de ciencias forestales · doi:10.29298/rmcf.v11i60.719 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sector analysis of Turkish markets using the Promethee method
Altın, H. (2020) · Pressacademia · doi:10.17261/pressacademia.2020.1296 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Paper making raw materials assessed by bipolar fuzzy environment
Preethi, R., & Shanthi, S. A. (2023) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.064 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Forest Estates/Organisational Units Ranking Model - The MRG Model
Čomić, D. R. (2019) · South-east European forestry · doi:10.15177/seefor.19-03 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Estrada, L. I. R., Lozano, J. L. R., Rodrı́guez-Trejo, D. A., & Villanueva‐Morales, A. (2022) · Sociedad y Ambiente · doi:10.31840/sya.vi25.2484 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
MCDM-AHP and PROMETHEE methods integrated for base service strategy vendor evaluation and selection
Akmaludin, A., Samudi, S., Palasara, N., Harmono, F. P., Widianto, K., & Muharrom, M. (2023) · International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences · doi:10.11591/ijaas.v12.i4.pp384-395 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Raw Material Supplier Selection Information System Using Promethee Method on Batik Tulis Lasem
Mahmudi, A. A. (2022) · East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.55927/eajmr.v1i6.683 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nursari, S. R. C., & Murtako, A. (2021) · bit-Tech · doi:10.32877/bt.v3i3.215 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nikolić, I., Milošević, I. M., Milijić, N., Jovanović, A., & Mihajlović, I. (2019) · Acta Polytechnica Hungarica · doi:10.12700/aph.16.1.2019.1.8
APPLICATION OF PROMETHEE II METHOD IN DECISION-MAKING FOR GRANT DISTRIBUTION IN ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT
Mahessya, R. A., & Trisna, N. (2025) · Proceedings on Engineering Sciences · doi:10.24874/pes07.02.012
- Authors
- Veza, I., Celar, S., & Peronja, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Split (HR)
- ORCID
- Peronja, Ivan
- Venue
- Procedia Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 100
- Pages
- 445-449
- ISSN
- 1877-7058 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000809780
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Collaboration in agile enterprises
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- industrial enterprises, enterprise ranking, enterprise competence, competency assessment, PROMETHEE, multi-criteria decision making, manufacturing networks, supplier selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
