Cited by 123Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationNursing education and management

Evidence-Based Nursing Education: Effective Use of Instructional Design and Simulated Learning Environments to Enhance Knowledge Transfer in Undergraduate Nursing Students

Robinson, Bridget K., Dearmon, Valorie·2013·Journal of Professional Nursing

Abstract

Much confidence has been placed in the nursing profession's potential to positively impact the U.S. health care system. However, concerns about patient safety and quality beckon health care providers to reassess traditional practices. Professional nursing programs aim to prepare novice nurses with strong clinical skills to effectively and safely care for patients. Faculty shortages and fewer clinical sites for students present challenges to faculty. Limited exposure in the clinical practice setting hinders the development of intuition. In addition, new graduates often enter practice with an unclear understanding of their role at the bedside. Educators are challenged to find innovative teaching strategies to effectively prepare new graduates for entering the workforce. Simulation has been shown to be a valuable teaching-learning strategy. Using an instructional design model that is student centered as the basis for simulation activities in an undergraduate curriculum is one method to effectively provide much needed clinical experience in a safe learning environment. This article details the application of the ADDIE (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation) model of instructional design to the use of simulation in nursing education in an effort to facilitate improved clinical performance in new graduate nurses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.04.022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simulation or virtual reality software cannot replace face to face practice in the traditional environment.

    “but it cannot replace face to face practice in the traditional environment (e.g., Robinson and Dearmon [59]).”

    From A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education (2022) · cites this paper as Robinson and Dearmon [59]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, B. K., & Dearmon, V.
Affiliations
  • Spring Hill College (US)
  • University of South Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Bridget K.
Venue
Journal of Professional Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
203-209
ISSN
  • 1532-8481 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-7223
OpenAlex
W1990188875
Cited by
123
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Professional Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
nursing education, simulation-based training, instructional design, ADDIE model, undergraduate nursing students, knowledge transfer, clinical skills development, new nurses, clinical experience, patient safety, student-centered learning
MeSH terms
Education, Nursing, Humans, Learning, Students, Nursing, Models, Educational, Evidence-Based Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review