Cited by 377Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsSurgical Simulation and Training

The use of virtual reality simulation among nursing students and registered nurses: a systematic review

Shorey, Shefaly, Ng, Esperanza Debby·2021·Nurse Education Today

Abstract

Background Due to technological advancements and the current generation being more tech-savvy, the use of virtual worlds in nursing education and clinical practice is increasingly popular. We performed a systematic review on randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies to examine the current evidence on the use of virtual worlds as a teaching tool and to ascertain the outcomes measured.Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies.Data sources Six electronic databases (PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ProQuest) were searched by title and abstract from each database's date of inception to December 2019.Review methods The Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool was used to conduct critical appraisal of the selected articles.Results Eighteen studies were included in the narrative summary. Studies were mostly conducted in developed countries and focused on nursing students. Advantages of virtual worlds include higher time-cost-effectiveness as compared to mannequin-based simulations and face-to-face lectures. Two major disadvantages were technological issues and the lack of realism.Conclusions Among the three learning outcomes (skills-based, cognitive, and affective), virtual worlds are the most effective in improving cognitive outcomes such as theoretical knowledge. This suggests that virtual worlds may be used as an alternative or complementary method to teach theoretical knowledge in nursing education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104662

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shorey, S., & Ng, E. D.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Shorey, Shefaly
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
98
Pages
104662
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3101349539
Cited by
377
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Tertiary Research Funds
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
virtual reality simulation, nursing education, nursing students, registered nurses, virtual worlds, simulation-based training, teaching aids, cognitive outcomes, affective learning outcomes, mannequin-based simulation, technical challenges, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Education, Nursing, Humans, Learning, Nurses, Students, Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review