Cited by 49Healthcare Education and Workforce IssuesGender Roles and Identity StudiesHealth and Well-being Studies

The mediating role of perceived prejudice in the relationship between self-esteem and psychological distress among Chinese male nursing students.

Feng, Danjun, Kong, Wenwen, Zhao, Wenjing, Li, Zhenbo, Wang, Liezheng·2019·Journal of Professional Nursing

Abstract

Male nursing students may experience social prejudice, which may lead to psychological distress. However, few quantitative studies have focused on their mental health. This study aimed to explore the relationship among self-esteem, perceived prejudice, and psychological distress in male nursing students, and compare differences in self-esteem, perceived prejudice, and psychological distress, as well as the relationships among these variables between male nursing students who selected nursing as their first choice for a major and those who did not. A survey based on a cross-sectional design was used. Self-esteem, perceived prejudice, and psychological distress of 460 male nursing students in China were measured using the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, a self-developed questionnaire, and the Kessler 10, respectively. Structural equation modeling was adopted to test the theoretical model regarding the relationships among self-esteem, perceived prejudice, and psychological distress. The results indicated that 82.2% of the participants reported psychological distress. The participants who did not select nursing as their first choice for a major reported a significantly higher perceived prejudice, higher prevalence of psychological distress, and lower self-esteem. Therefore, when selecting male students, nursing schools must prioritize those who selected nursing as their first choice for a major.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.05.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 49

Authors
Feng, D., Kong, W., Zhao, W., Li, Z., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
Shandong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Feng, Danjun
Venue
Journal of Professional Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
505-511
ISSN
  • 1532-8481 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-7223
OpenAlex
W2946381799
Cited by
49
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 4
FWCI
19.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Professional Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shandong University (2017WLJH42)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
self-esteem, perceived prejudice, psychological distress, male nursing students, gender discrimination in nursing, nursing school admission, Chinese students, mediating effect
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Adult, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Nurses, Male, Self Concept, Students, Nursing, Young Adult, Sexism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review