Cited by 36Innovative Teaching MethodsEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentInnovations in Medical Education

Impact of flipped classroom approach on undergraduate nursing student's critical thinking skills

Sezer, Tufan Aslı, Esenay, Figen Işık·2022·Journal of Professional Nursing

Abstract

Background Enriching the undergraduate nursing main courses innovative approaches such as flipped classroom method, which may aid improving students' metacognitive learning strategies, are regarded to be very important in terms of enhancing critical thinking and problem-solving skills in nursing care. Aim This study aimed to determine if there were significant differences in performance and critical thinking skills of nursing students who were taught using the flipped classroom method versus those who were taught using the online traditional learning approach. Another aim was for students to describe their opinions of using the flipped classroom method. Methods This study adopted a quasi-experimental study design. A total of 63 nursing students participated in the study. The experimental group followed the flipped classroom learning approach, while the control group followed the online traditional learning approach. The study involved a pre- and post-test assessment to examine the students' learning achievements and critical thinking skills. Results The results indicate that the flipped classroom approach has no significantly different effect on students' academic achievement and critical thinking, compared to online traditional lecturing. However, in contrast to the analysis of the results, students generally stated that learning with a flipped classroom approach was more helpful and efficient, and that the method provided a dynamic learning session during lectures. Conclusions Flipped classroom approach planned for a part of the pediatric nursing education did not show significant difference compared to online traditional lecturing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These assessments are often followed by feedback from instructors during class.

    “These assessments are often followed by feedback from instructors during class (Ng, 2023;Sezer & Esenay, 2022).”
  • 28 of the studies included in the meta-analysis were published after 2020, and only two of them considered the influence of Covid-19 on the delivery mode of in-class activities.

    “It is also noticeable that even though 28 of the studies included in our meta-analysis were published after 2020, only two of them considered the influence of Covid-19 on the delivery mode of in-class activities (Ng, 2023;Sezer & Esenay, 2022).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sezer, T. A., & Esenay, F. I.
Affiliations
Ankara University (TR)
Corresponding author
Sezer, Tufan Aslı
Venue
Journal of Professional Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
42
Pages
201-208
ISSN
  • 1532-8481 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-7223
OpenAlex
W4286423339
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
15.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Professional Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
flipped classroom, critical thinking skills, nursing students, undergraduate nursing education, academic performance, student perceptions, pediatric nursing education, metacognitive learning strategies
MeSH terms
Child, Curriculum, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Students, Nursing, Thinking, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review