Impact of flipped classroom approach on undergraduate nursing student's critical thinking skills
Abstract
Background Enriching the undergraduate nursing main courses innovative approaches such as flipped classroom method, which may aid improving students' metacognitive learning strategies, are regarded to be very important in terms of enhancing critical thinking and problem-solving skills in nursing care. Aim This study aimed to determine if there were significant differences in performance and critical thinking skills of nursing students who were taught using the flipped classroom method versus those who were taught using the online traditional learning approach. Another aim was for students to describe their opinions of using the flipped classroom method. Methods This study adopted a quasi-experimental study design. A total of 63 nursing students participated in the study. The experimental group followed the flipped classroom learning approach, while the control group followed the online traditional learning approach. The study involved a pre- and post-test assessment to examine the students' learning achievements and critical thinking skills. Results The results indicate that the flipped classroom approach has no significantly different effect on students' academic achievement and critical thinking, compared to online traditional lecturing. However, in contrast to the analysis of the results, students generally stated that learning with a flipped classroom approach was more helpful and efficient, and that the method provided a dynamic learning session during lectures. Conclusions Flipped classroom approach planned for a part of the pediatric nursing education did not show significant difference compared to online traditional lecturing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These assessments are often followed by feedback from instructors during class.
“These assessments are often followed by feedback from instructors during class (Ng, 2023;Sezer & Esenay, 2022).”
From Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Sezer & Esenay, 2022
28 of the studies included in the meta-analysis were published after 2020, and only two of them considered the influence of Covid-19 on the delivery mode of in-class activities.
“It is also noticeable that even though 28 of the studies included in our meta-analysis were published after 2020, only two of them considered the influence of Covid-19 on the delivery mode of in-class activities (Ng, 2023;Sezer & Esenay, 2022).”
From Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Sezer & Esenay, 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis
Gong, J., Cai, S., & Cheng, M. (2024) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09700-7 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sezer, T. A., & Esenay, F. I.
- Affiliations
- Ankara University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Sezer, Tufan Aslı
- Venue
- Journal of Professional Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 42
- Pages
- 201-208
- ISSN
- 1532-8481 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-7223
- OpenAlex
- W4286423339
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 15.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Professional Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- flipped classroom, critical thinking skills, nursing students, undergraduate nursing education, academic performance, student perceptions, pediatric nursing education, metacognitive learning strategies
- MeSH terms
- Child, Curriculum, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Students, Nursing, Thinking, Problem-Based Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review