The high school to higher education pipeline program: A focus on Black male representation in nursing
Abstract
Background Increasing the number of Black men in nursing can enhance racial, ethnic, and gender diversity within the nursing workforce. However, there is a lack of nursing pipeline programs that specifically focus on Black men. Purpose The purposes of this article are to describe the High School to Higher Education (H2H) Pipeline Program as an approach to increasing representation of Black men in nursing and to describe H2H Program participants' perspectives of the program after the first year. Methods A descriptive qualitative approach was used to explore Black males' perceptions of the H2H Program. Twelve of the 17 program participants completed questionnaires. Data collected were analyzed to identify themes. Findings Four themes emerged during data analysis regarding the participants' perspectives of the H2H Program: 1) Coming to realize, 2) Managing stereotypes, stigma, and social norms, 3) Making connections, and 4) Expressing gratitude. Conclusion Results indicated that the H2H Program provided participants with a support network that fostered a sense of belonging. The H2H Program was beneficial for program participants in their development and engagement in nursing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mentorship and support structures are frequently mentioned as important components of effective pathway programs.
“Mentorship and support structures, in particular, are frequently mentioned as important components of effective pathway programs (Crump et al., 2015;Patterson et al., 2023;Stephenson-Hunter et al., 2019).”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Patterson et al., 2023
Patterson et al. (2023) describes the High School to Higher Education (H2H) Pipeline Program, where mentees reported positive experiences that helped them feel included and valued.
“Patterson et al. (2023) describes the High School to Higher Education (H2H) Pipeline Program, where mentees reported positive experiences that helped them feel included and valued, which reinforces what is known about the benefits of intentional mentoring of UR students in tertiary studies (Shuler et al., 2021).”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Patterson et al., 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bright, D., Hughes, S., & Muir, R. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010170 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Patterson, L. D., Wheeler, R. M., Edge, N., & Daniel, G.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patterson, LaDonia D.
- Venue
- Journal of Professional Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 47
- Pages
- 15-24
- ISSN
- 1532-8481 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-7223
- OpenAlex
- W4365812392
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Professional Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- AARP Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- student perceptions, sense of belonging, social support networks, racial and ethnic diversity, gender diversity
- MeSH terms
- Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Students, Nursing, Social Stigma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review