The DOI matches its Crossref record; 153 of the 153 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of polymeric membranes and processes for potable water reuse
Open accessAbstract
Conventional water resources in many regions are insufficient to meet the water needs of growing populations, thus reuse is gaining acceptance as a method of water supply augmentation. Recent advancements in membrane technology have allowed for the reclamation of municipal wastewater for the production of drinking water, i.e., potable reuse. Although public perception can be a challenge, potable reuse is often the least energy-intensive method of providing additional drinking water to water stressed regions. A variety of membranes have been developed that can remove water contaminants ranging from particles and pathogens to dissolved organic compounds and salts. Typically, potable reuse treatment plants use polymeric membranes for microfiltration or ultrafiltration in conjunction with reverse osmosis and, in some cases, nanofiltration. Membrane properties, including pore size, wettability, surface charge, roughness, thermal resistance, chemical stability, permeability, thickness and mechanical strength, vary between membranes and applications. Advancements in membrane technology including new membrane materials, coatings, and manufacturing methods, as well as emerging membrane processes such as membrane bioreactors, electrodialysis, and forward osmosis have been developed to improve selectivity, energy consumption, fouling resistance, and/or capital cost. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the role of polymeric membranes in the treatment of wastewater to potable water quality and highlight recent advancements in separation processes. Beyond membranes themselves, this review covers the background and history of potable reuse, and commonly used potable reuse process chains, pretreatment steps, and advanced oxidation processes. Key trends in membrane technology include novel configurations, materials and fouling prevention techniques. Challenges still facing membrane-based potable reuse applications, including chemical and biological contaminant removal, membrane fouling, and public perception, are highlighted as areas in need of further research and development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment
Elimelech, M., & Phillip, W. A. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200488 · Cited by 6,711
Luo, Y., Guo, W., Ngo, H. H., Nghiem, L. D., Hai, F. I., Zhang, J., Liang, S., & Wang, X. C. (2014) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.065 · Cited by 3,983
The solution-diffusion model: a review
Wijmans, J. G., & Baker, R. W. (1995) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/0376-7388(95)00102-i · Cited by 3,499
Basic Principles of Membrane Technology
Mulder, M. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1766-8 · Cited by 2,999
Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments
CATH, T., CHILDRESS, A., & ELIMELECH, M. (2006) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048 · Cited by 2,533
Ozonation of drinking water: Part I. Oxidation kinetics and product formation
von Gunten, U. (2003) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00457-8 · Cited by 2,448
Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment
Qu, X., Alvarez, P. J. J., & Li, Q. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058 · Cited by 2,444
Progress in the production and modification of PVDF membranes
Liu, F., Hashim, N. A., Liu, Y., Abed, M. R. M., & Li, K. (2011) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.014 · Cited by 2,275
Lee, K. P., Arnot, T. C., & Mattia, D. (2011) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.036 · Cited by 2,148
State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination
Fritzmann, C., Löwenberg, J., Wintgens, T., & Melin, T. (2007) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2006.12.009 · Cited by 1,977
Cited by
Peng, H., & Zhao, Q. (2021) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202009430 · Cited by 389
Interdependence of Kinetics and Fluid Dynamics in the Design of Photocatalytic Membrane Reactors
Chakachaka, V., Tshangana, C., Mahlangu, O., Mamba, B., & Muleja, A. (2022) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes12080745 · Cited by 21
Kumar, A., Rachamalla, M., & Adarsh, A. (2023) · Metal Organic Frameworks for Wastewater Contaminant Removal · doi:10.1002/9783527841523.ch7 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Warsinger, D. M., Chakraborty, S., Tow, E. W., Plumlee, M. H., Bellona, C., Loutatidou, S., Karimi, L., Mikelonis, A. M., Achilli, A., Ghassemi, A., Padhye, L. P., Snyder, S. A., Curcio, S., Vecitis, C. D., Arafat, H. A., & Lienhard, J. H.
- Venue
- Progress in Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 81
- Pages
- 209-237
- ISSN
- 0079-6700 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793344462
- Cited by
- 747
- References
- 153
- FWCI
- 30.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of polymeric membranes and processes for potable water reuse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.01.004
- The paper
- Warsinger, D. M., Chakraborty, S., Tow, E. W., Plumlee, M. H., Bellona, C., Loutatidou, S., Karimi, L., Mikelonis, A. M., Achilli, A., Ghassemi, A., Padhye, L. P., Snyder, S. A., Curcio, S., Vecitis, C. D., Arafat, H. A., & Lienhard, J. H. (2018). A review of polymeric membranes and processes for potable water reuse. Progress in Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.01.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.