The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Digital lean manufacturing Collaborative university-industry education in systems design for lean transformation
Open accessAbstract
There are several examples of successful lean practice in manufacturing and service to reduce cost, achieve quality and increase competitiveness; however, some companies still fail to adopt lean practice. The lean practice is not only about implementing lean tools, but also developing people and transforming company culture. Facing a declining manufacturing competitiveness, Thailand needs lean manufacturing and lean automation to regain competitiveness. This paper presents Digital Lean Manufacturing, a one-semester course based on project-based learning (PBL) designed by university and industry under SIIT-DENSO collaboration. It focuses on adopting Japanese-style lean manufacturing culture and digital engineering to empower students with high-tech T-shaped skills. Using exercises in Lego car assembly, the course develops both cognitive and non-cognitive skills in lean manufacturing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many companies fail in the process of assimilating and embedding lean tools.
“many companies fail in this process [6,7].”
From Lean Healthcare Tools for Processes Evaluation: An Integrative Review. (2021) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- B. Nidhiprabha, The Rise and Fall of Thailand’s Export-Oriented Industries, Asian Economic Papers (2017), Volume 16, Issue 3, Fall 2017, 128-150. · DOI
- Fairris, 2002, Productive efficiency and the lean production system in Japan and the United States, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 23, 10.1177/0143831X02234004 · DOI
- PwC, European Commission, Skills for smart industrial specialization and digital transformation: final report., Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2019, doi: 10.2826/550778. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lean Healthcare Tools for Processes Evaluation: An Integrative Review.
de Barros, L. B., Bassi, L. D. C., Caldas, L. P., Sarantopoulos, A., Zeferino, E. B. B., Minatogawa, V., & Gasparino, R. C. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18147389 · Cited by 90
Digital Lean Manufacturing: A Literature Review
Powell, D. J., & Romero, D. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) · doi:10.1109/ieem50564.2021.9673032 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Raweewan, M., & Kojima, F.
- Affiliations
- Thammasat University (TH)
- Denso (Japan) (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Raweewan, Morrakot
- Venue
- Procedia Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 45
- Pages
- 183-188
- ISSN
- 2351-9789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3023008114
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 67.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia Manufacturing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mechatronics Education and Applications
- Keywords
- lean transformation, university-industry collaboration, project-based learning, lean culture, digital engineering, T-shaped skills, non-cognitive skills, manufacturing competitiveness, Thailand
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
