Cited by 12Digital Transformation in IndustryQuality and Supply ManagementManagement and Optimization Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital Lean Manufacturing: A Literature Review

Powell, Daryl J., Romero, David·2021·2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)

Abstract

The purpose of this literature review is to examine how Digital Lean Manufacturing is viewed in the academic literature and how it is being operationalized. We reviewed 100+ scientific articles to identify what has been written about Digital Lean Manufacturing. There appears to have been two waves of scientific research on the theme of Digital Lean Manufacturing covered in the extant literature since the term first appeared in the year 2007. This paper is the first comprehensive literature review on Digital Lean Manufacturing and presents pertinent factors and useful insights into this emergent and intensifying field of research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ieem50564.2021.9673032

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. ballé, 2019, The Lean Sensei
  2. coughlan, 2016, Action Research, Research Methodology for Operations Management
  3. romero, 2017, Strategizing for Production Innovation. Advances in Production Management Systems: The Path to Intelligent, Intelligent Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing IFIP AICT, 513, 3
  4. romero, 2018, Digital Lean Cyber-Physical Production Systems: The Emergence of Digital Lean Manufacturing and the Significance of Digital Waste. Advances in Production Management Systems: Production Management for Data-Driven, Intelligent Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing IFIP AICT, 535, 11
  5. lorenz, 2019, Lean and Digitalization – Contradictions or Complements? Advances in Production Management Systems: Production Management for the Factory of the Future, IFIP AICT, 566, 77
  6. sordan, 2020, Towards Digital Lean Manufacturing: A Brazilian Case, 4th International Conference on Quality Engineering and Management
  7. alieva, 2020, Employees in the Midst of Digital Lean Transformation The Literature Framework
  8. chatzopoulos, 2020, Digitization and Artificial Intelligence for Lean Customer Experience Management, transformation, 22, 24

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Powell, D. J., & Romero, D.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Venue
2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-12-13
Pages
659-662
OpenAlex
W4205356474
Cited by
12
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.40
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
Research Council of Norway
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
lean manufacturing, digitalization, operationalization, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review